Literature DB >> 21550578

Importance of adjunctive heart failure optimization immediately after implantation to improve long-term outcomes with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Wilfried Mullens1, Jacek Kepa, Philippe De Vusser, Jan Vercammen, Maximo Rivero-Ayerza, Patrick Wagner, Joseph Dens, Mathias Vrolix, Pieter Vandervoort, W H Wilson Tang.   

Abstract

Despite improvement in morbidity and mortality with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), disease progression continues to affect a subset of patients and there is limited effort to identify contributing factors. Our objective was to investigate if a protocol-driven approach incorporated in a management strategy of heart failure immediately after implantation would provide incremental benefits beyond usual care after implantation. We reviewed 114 consecutive patients with CRT implanted from 2005 through 2009 who received usual care after implantation or underwent protocol-driven CRT care after implantation. Preimplantation characteristics in patients receiving usual versus protocol-driven care were similar in left ventricular (LV) dimension (LV internal diastolic diameter 6.2 ± 0.8 vs 6.4 ± 1.0 cm), LV ejection fraction (26 ± 8% vs 25% ± 8%), QRS width, and medication usage. Major adjustments during the protocol-driven approach were uptitration of neurohormonal blockers (64%), echocardiographically guided atrioventricular optimization (50%), heart failure education (42%), arrhythmia management (19%), and LV lead repositioning (7%). Although positive LV remodeling was noted in the 2 groups at 6 months, extent was significantly greater in the protocol-driven approach compared to usual care (change in LV internal diastolic diameter 0.7 ± 0.6 cm vs 0.2 ± 1.2 cm, p = 0.01; change in LV ejection fraction 11 ± 7% vs 7 ± 9%, p = 0.01), which was associated with fewer major adverse events (14% vs 53%, p <0.001). In conclusion, a protocol-driven approach for patients with CRT started immediately after implantation is associated with incremental favorable effects on reverse remodeling and fewer adverse events compared to usual care after implantation. These effects appeared to be driven not only by changes in device settings and arrhythmia management but also by concomitant medication optimization and heart failure education.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21550578     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: history, present status, and future directions.

Authors:  Leeor M Jaffe; Daniel P Morin
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

2.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy update: evolving indications, expanding benefit?

Authors:  C Butcher; Y Mareev; V Markides; M Mason; T Wong; J G F Cleland
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods.

Authors:  Pieter Martens; Frederik Hendrik Verbrugge; Wilfried Mullens
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

4.  Effects of Ivabradine on Patients with Depressed Left Ventricular Function after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Hung-Yu Chang; Hsin-Ti Huang; Chi-Yen Wang; Hsu-Chung Lo; Hsiao-Jen Chen; An-Ning Feng; Man-Cai Fong; Chi-Nan Chen; Hung-Chuan Chang; Kuo-Feng Chiang; Jin-Long Huang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.800

5.  Combined management of atrial fibrillation and heart failure: case studies.

Authors:  Frederik H Verbrugge; Wilfried Mullens
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 6.  Co-Morbidities and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: When Should They Modify Patient Selection?

Authors:  Martin H Ruwald
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-06-30

7.  Left ventricular response after cardiac resynchronization therapy is related to early left atrial volume reduction.

Authors:  In-Jeong Cho; Jae-Sun Uhm; Jaewon Oh; Jong-Ho Nam; Hee Tae Yu; Taehoon Kim; Boyoung Joung; Seok-Min Kang
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.884

8.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes in patients under nonoptimal medical therapy.

Authors:  Belén Alvarez-Alvarez; Javier García-Seara; Jose L Martínez-Sande; Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero; Xesús A Fernández López; Laila González-Melchor; Rosa M Agra Bermejo; Diego Iglesias-Alvarez; Francisco Gude Sampedro; Carla Díaz-Louzao; José R González-Juanatey
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2018-08-07

Review 9.  Sacubitril/Valsartan in the Management of Heart Failure Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

Authors:  Sijing Cheng; Nixiao Zhang; Wei Hua
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.571

10.  Development and implementation of a cardiac resynchronisation therapy care pathway: improved process and reduced resource use.

Authors:  Antonius Martinus Wilhelmus van Stipdonk; Stijn Schretlen; Wim Dohmen; Hans-Peter Brunner-LaRocca; Christian Knackstedt; Kevin Vernooy
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2021-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.