Literature DB >> 21550096

Removal of residual dissolved methane gas in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating low-strength wastewater at low temperature with degassing membrane.

Wasala M K R T W Bandara1, Hisashi Satoh, Manabu Sasakawa, Yoshihito Nakahara, Masahiro Takahashi, Satoshi Okabe.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the efficiency of dissolved methane (D-CH(4)) collection by degasification from the effluent of a bench-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating synthetic wastewater. A hollow-fiber degassing membrane module was used for degasification. This module was connected to the liquid outlet of the UASB reactor. After chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency of the UASB reactor became stable, D-CH(4) discharged from the UASB reactor was collected. Under 35 °C and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 10 h, average D-CH(4) concentration could be reduced from 63 mg COD L(-1) to 15 mg COD L(-1); this, in turn, resulted in an increase in total methane (CH(4)) recovery efficiency from 89% to 97%. Furthermore, we investigated the effects of temperature and HRT of the UASB reactor on degasification efficiency. Average D-CH(4) concentration was as high as 104 mg COD L(-1) at 15 °C because of the higher solubility of CH(4) gas in liquid; the average D-CH(4) concentration was reduced to 14 mg COD L(-1) by degasification. Accordingly, total CH(4) recovery efficiency increased from 71% to 97% at 15 °C as a result of degasification. Moreover, degasification tended to cause an increase in particulate COD removal efficiency. The UASB reactor was operated at the same COD loading rate, but different wastewater feed rates and HRTs. Although average D-CH(4) concentration in the UASB reactor was almost unchanged (ca. 70 mg COD L(-1)) regardless of the HRT value, the CH(4) discharge rate from the UASB reactor increased because of an increase in the wastewater feed rate. Because the D-CH(4) concentration could be reduced down to 12 ± 1 mg COD L(-1) by degasification at an HRT of 6.7 h, the CH(4) recovery rate was 1.5 times higher under degasification than under normal operation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21550096     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  7 in total

1.  Design and evaluation of degassed anaerobic membrane biofilm reactors for improved methane recovery.

Authors:  Brian C Crone; George A Sorial; Jonathan G Pressman; Hodon Ryu; Scott P Keely; Nichole Brinkman; Christina Bennett-Stamper; Jay L Garland
Journal:  Bioresour Technol Rep       Date:  2020-06-01

Review 2.  Methanotrophs: Discoveries, Environmental Relevance, and a Perspective on Current and Future Applications.

Authors:  Simon Guerrero-Cruz; Annika Vaksmaa; Marcus A Horn; Helge Niemann; Maite Pijuan; Adrian Ho
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 3.  Resource Recovery from Wastewater by Biological Technologies: Opportunities, Challenges, and Prospects.

Authors:  Daniel Puyol; Damien J Batstone; Tim Hülsen; Sergi Astals; Miriam Peces; Jens O Krömer
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Hollow-Fiber Membrane Contactor for Biogas Recovery from Real Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor Permeate.

Authors:  Qazi Sohaib; Carla Kalakech; Christophe Charmette; Jim Cartier; Geoffroy Lesage; Jean-Pierre Mericq
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19

5.  Flat PVDF Membrane with Enhanced Hydrophobicity through Alkali Activation and Organofluorosilanisation for Dissolved Methane Recovery.

Authors:  Ramón Jiménez-Robles; Beatriz María Moreno-Torralbo; Jose David Badia; Vicente Martínez-Soria; Marta Izquierdo
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15

6.  Membrane biofilm development improves COD removal in anaerobic membrane bioreactor wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Adam L Smith; Steven J Skerlos; Lutgarde Raskin
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 5.813

7.  Biological Phosphorus Removal During High-Rate, Low-Temperature, Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater.

Authors:  Ciara Keating; Jason P Chin; Dermot Hughes; Panagiotis Manesiotis; Denise Cysneiros; Therese Mahony; Cindy J Smith; John W McGrath; Vincent O'Flaherty
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.