Peter F Nichol1, Yukio Saijoh. 1. Department of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, University of Wisconsin SMPH, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USA. nichol@surgery.wisc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The murine cecum is a critical digestive structure. Morphogenesis of the cecum involves several key genes, including Homeobox (Hox) d12. Ectopic expression of Hoxd12 has been shown to result in cecal agenesis and a down-regulation of both Fibroblast growth factor 10 (Fgf10) and the Pituitary homeobox 2 gene (Pitx2). Homozygous null mutation of Fgf10 or its cognate receptor Fgfr2IIIb results in severe cecal defects where there is the initiation of mesodermal budding, but a failure of the endoderm to grow and extend into this structure. We examined the expression of Pitx2 in the cecum and hypothesized that homozygous null mutation of Pitx2 would result in cecal agenesis. METHODS: IACUC approval was obtained for these studies. Whole mount in situ hybridizations for Pitx2 were performed on wild-type embryos between embryonic d (E)11.0 and E12.5. Pitx2 -/- and Fgfr2IIIb -/- embryos were generated from n/+ heterozygote breedings and harvested at E10.5, E11.5, and E13.5. Genotypes were confirmed by PCR. Morphology of Pitx2 -/- cecae were compared with those of wild-type littermates and Fgfr2IIIb -/- embryos at identical stages. Embryos were fixed overnight and photographed the following day. RESULTS: Pitx2 is expressed in the cecal mesoderm and endoderm as early as E11.0. Expression becomes increasingly more robust by E12.5. Homozygous null mutation of Pitx2 results in agenesis of the cecum. In contrast to Fgfr2IIIb -/- embryos, which demonstrate a persistent mesodermal bud as late as E18.5, no mesodermal bud is present in Pitx2 -/- embryos. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that Pitx2 is a critical regulatory gene in cecal morphogenesis and suggest that Pitx2 is required for initiation of mesodermal budding and likely resides upstream of Fgf10-Fgfr2IIIb signaling in the normal development of this structure.
BACKGROUND: The murine cecum is a critical digestive structure. Morphogenesis of the cecum involves several key genes, including Homeobox (Hox) d12. Ectopic expression of Hoxd12 has been shown to result in cecal agenesis and a down-regulation of both Fibroblast growth factor 10 (Fgf10) and the Pituitary homeobox 2 gene (Pitx2). Homozygous null mutation of Fgf10 or its cognate receptor Fgfr2IIIb results in severe cecal defects where there is the initiation of mesodermal budding, but a failure of the endoderm to grow and extend into this structure. We examined the expression of Pitx2 in the cecum and hypothesized that homozygous null mutation of Pitx2 would result in cecal agenesis. METHODS: IACUC approval was obtained for these studies. Whole mount in situ hybridizations for Pitx2 were performed on wild-type embryos between embryonic d (E)11.0 and E12.5. Pitx2 -/- and Fgfr2IIIb -/- embryos were generated from n/+ heterozygote breedings and harvested at E10.5, E11.5, and E13.5. Genotypes were confirmed by PCR. Morphology of Pitx2 -/- cecae were compared with those of wild-type littermates and Fgfr2IIIb -/- embryos at identical stages. Embryos were fixed overnight and photographed the following day. RESULTS:Pitx2 is expressed in the cecal mesoderm and endoderm as early as E11.0. Expression becomes increasingly more robust by E12.5. Homozygous null mutation of Pitx2 results in agenesis of the cecum. In contrast to Fgfr2IIIb -/- embryos, which demonstrate a persistent mesodermal bud as late as E18.5, no mesodermal bud is present in Pitx2 -/- embryos. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that Pitx2 is a critical regulatory gene in cecal morphogenesis and suggest that Pitx2 is required for initiation of mesodermal budding and likely resides upstream of Fgf10-Fgfr2IIIb signaling in the normal development of this structure.
Authors: C R Lin; C Kioussi; S O'Connell; P Briata; D Szeto; F Liu; J C Izpisúa-Belmonte; M G Rosenfeld Journal: Nature Date: 1999-09-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Paul B Eckburg; Elisabeth M Bik; Charles N Bernstein; Elizabeth Purdom; Les Dethlefsen; Michael Sargent; Steven R Gill; Karen E Nelson; David A Relman Journal: Science Date: 2005-04-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Michael J Geske; Xiuqin Zhang; Khushbu K Patel; David M Ornitz; Thaddeus S Stappenbeck Journal: Development Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: R C Burns; T J Fairbanks; F Sala; S De Langhe; A Mailleux; J P Thiery; C Dickson; N Itoh; D Warburton; K D Anderson; S Bellusci Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Denise Al Alam; Frederic G Sala; Sheryl Baptista; Rosanna Galzote; Soula Danopoulos; Caterina Tiozzo; Philip Gage; Tracy Grikscheit; David Warburton; Mark R Frey; Saverio Bellusci Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Ragnar P Kristjansson; Stefania Benonisdottir; Asmundur Oddsson; Tessel E Galesloot; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Katja K Aben; Olafur B Davidsson; Stefan Jonsson; Gudny A Arnadottir; Brynjar O Jensson; G Bragi Walters; Jon K Sigurdsson; Snaevar Sigurdsson; Hilma Holm; David O Arnar; Gudmundur Thorgeirsson; Kristin Alexiusdottir; Ingileif Jonsdottir; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Thorvaldur Jonsson; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Thorunn Rafnar; Patrick Sulem; Kari Stefansson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 4.379