Literature DB >> 21549619

Protective capacity of memory CD8+ T cells is dictated by antigen exposure history and nature of the infection.

Jeffrey C Nolz1, John T Harty.   

Abstract

Infection or vaccination confers heightened resistance to pathogen rechallenge because of quantitative and qualitative differences between naive and primary memory T cells. Herein, we show that secondary (boosted) memory CD8+ T cells were better than primary memory CD8+ T cells in controlling some, but not all acute infections with diverse pathogens. However, secondary memory CD8+ T cells were less efficient than an equal number of primary memory cells at preventing chronic LCMV infection and are more susceptible to functional exhaustion. Importantly, localization of memory CD8+ T cells within lymph nodes, which is reduced by antigen restimulation, was critical for both viral control in lymph nodes and for the sustained CD8+ T cell response required to prevent chronic LCMV infection. Thus, repeated antigen stimulation shapes memory CD8+ T cell populations to either enhance or decrease per cell protective immunity in a pathogen-specific manner, a concept of importance in vaccine design against specific diseases.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21549619      PMCID: PMC3103642          DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunity        ISSN: 1074-7613            Impact factor:   31.745


  43 in total

Review 1.  Effector and memory T-cell differentiation: implications for vaccine development.

Authors:  Susan M Kaech; E John Wherry; Raft Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 53.106

2.  Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets.

Authors:  E John Wherry; Volker Teichgräber; Todd C Becker; David Masopust; Susan M Kaech; Rustom Antia; Ulrich H von Andrian; Rafi Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2003-02-03       Impact factor: 25.606

3.  Differential sensitivity of naive and memory CD8+ T cells to apoptosis in vivo.

Authors:  Jason M Grayson; Laurie E Harrington; J Gibson Lanier; E John Wherry; Rafi Ahmed
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  History and prospects for viral disease eradication.

Authors:  Ciro A de Quadros
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2002-09-21       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Priming of memory but not effector CD8 T cells by a killed bacterial vaccine.

Authors:  G Lauvau; S Vijh; P Kong; T Horng; K Kerksiek; N Serbina; R A Tuma; E G Pamer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Viral persistence alters CD8 T-cell immunodominance and tissue distribution and results in distinct stages of functional impairment.

Authors:  E John Wherry; Joseph N Blattman; Kaja Murali-Krishna; Robbert van der Most; Rafi Ahmed
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Regulation of CD8+ T cells undergoing primary and secondary responses to infection in the same host.

Authors:  Vladimir P Badovinac; Kelly A Nordyke Messingham; Sara E Hamilton; John T Harty
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Lymphocyte egress from thymus and peripheral lymphoid organs is dependent on S1P receptor 1.

Authors:  Mehrdad Matloubian; Charles G Lo; Guy Cinamon; Matthew J Lesneski; Ying Xu; Volker Brinkmann; Maria L Allende; Richard L Proia; Jason G Cyster
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Programmed contraction of CD8(+) T cells after infection.

Authors:  Vladimir P Badovinac; Brandon B Porter; John T Harty
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2002-06-03       Impact factor: 25.606

10.  Protection against CTL escape and clinical disease in a murine model of virus persistence.

Authors:  Taeg S Kim; Stanley Perlman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 5.422

View more
  72 in total

1.  Increased numbers of preexisting memory CD8 T cells and decreased T-bet expression can restrain terminal differentiation of secondary effector and memory CD8 T cells.

Authors:  Nikhil S Joshi; Weiguo Cui; Claudia X Dominguez; Jonathan H Chen; Timothy W Hand; Susan M Kaech
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Inflammatory IL-15 is required for optimal memory T cell responses.

Authors:  Martin J Richer; Lecia L Pewe; Lisa S Hancox; Stacey M Hartwig; Steven M Varga; John T Harty
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Virtual memory CD8 T cells display unique functional properties.

Authors:  June-Yong Lee; Sara E Hamilton; Adovi D Akue; Kristin A Hogquist; Stephen C Jameson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Inhibiting glycolytic metabolism enhances CD8+ T cell memory and antitumor function.

Authors:  Madhusudhanan Sukumar; Jie Liu; Yun Ji; Murugan Subramanian; Joseph G Crompton; Zhiya Yu; Rahul Roychoudhuri; Douglas C Palmer; Pawel Muranski; Edward D Karoly; Robert P Mohney; Christopher A Klebanoff; Ashish Lal; Toren Finkel; Nicholas P Restifo; Luca Gattinoni
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Rapid proliferation and differentiation impairs the development of memory CD8+ T cells in early life.

Authors:  Norah L Smith; Erin Wissink; Jocelyn Wang; Jennifer F Pinello; Miles P Davenport; Andrew Grimson; Brian D Rudd
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  An Excess of the Proinflammatory Cytokines IFN-γ and IL-12 Impairs the Development of the Memory CD8+ T Cell Response to Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Xuqing Zhang; Michael N Starnbach
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  T cells maintain an exhausted phenotype after antigen withdrawal and population reexpansion.

Authors:  Daniel T Utzschneider; Amandine Legat; Silvia A Fuertes Marraco; Lucie Carrié; Immanuel Luescher; Daniel E Speiser; Dietmar Zehn
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 25.606

8.  Progressive loss of memory T cell potential and commitment to exhaustion during chronic viral infection.

Authors:  Jill M Angelosanto; Shawn D Blackburn; Alison Crawford; E John Wherry
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis of adenovirus type 5 vector-induced memory CD8 T cells: not as bad as their reputation.

Authors:  Maria Abildgaard Steffensen; Peter Johannes Holst; Sanne Skovvang Steengaard; Benjamin Anderschou Holbech Jensen; Christina Bartholdy; Anette Stryhn; Jan Pravsgaard Christensen; Allan Randrup Thomsen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Increased T-bet is associated with senescence of influenza virus-specific CD8 T cells in aged humans.

Authors:  Douglas V Dolfi; Kathleen D Mansfield; Antonio M Polley; Susan A Doyle; Gordon J Freeman; Hanspeter Pircher; Kenneth E Schmader; E John Wherry
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 4.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.