Literature DB >> 21549357

"What you encode is not necessarily what you store": evidence for sparse feature representations from mismatch negativity.

Sonia A Cornell1, Aditi Lahiri, Carsten Eulitz.   

Abstract

The present study examines whether vowels embedded in complex stimuli may possess underspecified representations in the mental lexicon. The second goal was to assess the possible interference of the lexical status of stimuli under study. Minimal pairs of German nouns differing only in the stressed vowels [e], [ø], and [o], and derived pseudowords, were used to measure the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) in a passive oddball-paradigm. The differing vowels were chosen such that the place of articulation information was conflicting vs. non-conflicting in the framework of models assuming underspecified representations in the mental lexicon (i.e. minimizing featural information by omitting redundant information in order to ensure efficient speech processing), whereas models assuming fully specified phonological representations would predict equal levels of conflict in all possible contrasts. The observed pattern of MMN amplitude differences was in accordance to predictions of models assuming underspecified phonological representations. As the possible interferences by other levels of linguistic processing was demonstrated, it seems favorable to use pseudowords for investigating phonological effects by means of MMN.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21549357     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  15 in total

1.  Converging evidence for [coronal] underspecification in English-speaking adults.

Authors:  Alycia Cummings; John Madden; Kathryn Hefta
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Linguistic category structure influences early auditory processing: Converging evidence from mismatch responses and cortical oscillations.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Philip J Monahan; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  The five myths of MMN: redefining how to use MMN in basic and clinical research.

Authors:  E S Sussman; S Chen; J Sussman-Fort; E Dinces
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Underspecification in toddlers' and adults' lexical representations.

Authors:  Jie Ren; Uriel Cohen Priva; James L Morgan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-09-14

5.  Putting underspecification in context: ERP evidence for sparse representations in morphophonological alternations.

Authors:  Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  A sparse neural code for some speech sounds but not for others.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Alexandra Bendixen; Nelson J Trujillo-Barreto; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evidence for the role of German final devoicing in pre-attentive speech processing: a mismatch negativity study.

Authors:  Hubert Truckenbrodt; Johanna Steinberg; Thomas K Jacobsen; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-25

8.  Representation and Processing of Lexical Tone and Tonal Variants: Evidence from the Mismatch Negativity.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Li; Yiya Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Asymmetries in Vowel Perception: An English-French Cross-Linguistic Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Linda Polka; Monika Molnar; T Christina Zhao; Matthew Masapollo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.473

10.  No place for /h/: an ERP investigation of English fricative place features.

Authors:  Kevin Schluter; Stephen Politzer-Ahles; Diogo Almeida
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.