Literature DB >> 21548445

Human basophils: a unique biological instrument to detect the allergenicity of food.

V Sabato1, A J van Hengel, K J De Knop, M M Verweij, M M Hagendorens, C H Bridts, L S De Clerck, D Schiavino, W J Stevens, D G Ebo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Labeling of major food allergens is mandatory for the safety of allergic consumers. Although enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, polymerase chain reaction, and mass spectrometry are sensitive and specific instruments to detect trace amounts of food proteins, they cannot measure the ability of food constituents to trigger activation of mast cells or basophils. AIM: We evaluated the basophil activation test as an instrument to determine the allergenic potential of trace amounts of food allergens in complex matrices. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergy was selected as a proof-of-concept model.
METHODS: The study population comprised 5 severely peanut-allergic patients (3 males/2 females; median age, 12 years) all sensitized to 3 major peanut allergens (Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 3) and 5 peanut-tolerant individuals (2 males/3 females; median age, 8 years). Basophils from patients and controls were stimulated with pure peanut extract and blank and peanut-spiked (0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 ppm) biscuits (baking time 11, 16, 21, 26 minutes) and chocolate extracts.
RESULTS: Blank biscuits and chocolate did not induce cell activation in patients or controls. A comparison between patients and controls showed significantly higher activation of basophils after stimulation with 0.1 and 0.01 ppm of peanut-spiked biscuit at all baking times and peanut-spiked chocolate (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The basophil activation test is a highly sensitive and specific tool to detect traces of functionally active food allergens. For biscuits, its accuracy seems independent of baking time. Furthermore, it allows even the most sensitive patients to be included in study protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21548445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol        ISSN: 1018-9068            Impact factor:   4.333


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pros and Cons of Clinical Basophil Testing (BAT).

Authors:  Hans Jürgen Hoffmann; Edward F Knol; Martha Ferrer; Lina Mayorga; Vito Sabato; Alexandra F Santos; Bernadette Eberlein; Anna Nopp; Donald MacGlashan
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Update on the performance and application of basophil activation tests.

Authors:  Emily C McGowan; Sarbjit Saini
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Use of a basophil activation test as a complementary diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of severe peanut allergy in adults.

Authors:  Georgios Rentzos; Vanja Lundberg; Christina Lundqvist; Rui Rodrigues; Jenny van Odijk; Anna-Carin Lundell; Teet Pullerits; Esbjörn Telemo
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 5.871

4.  Oral peanut challenge identifies an allergy but the peanut allergen threshold sensitivity is not reproducible.

Authors:  Susanne Glaumann; Anna Nopp; S G O Johansson; Magnus P Borres; Caroline Nilsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Guidelines for the use and interpretation of diagnostic methods in adult food allergy.

Authors:  Donatella Macchia; Giovanni Melioli; Valerio Pravettoni; Eleonora Nucera; Marta Piantanida; Marco Caminati; Corrado Campochiaro; Mona-Rita Yacoub; Domenico Schiavino; Roberto Paganelli; Mario Di Gioacchino
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2015-10-05

6.  Utility of Specific IgE to Ara h 2 in Italian Allergic and Tolerant Children Sensitized to Peanut.

Authors:  Pasquale Comberiati; Laura Colavita; Federica Minniti; Giulia Paiola; Carlo Capristo; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Diego Giampiero Peroni
Journal:  Int J Mol Cell Med       Date:  2016-08-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.