Literature DB >> 2154829

Evaluation of proton density by magnetic resonance imaging: phantom experiments and analysis of multiple component proton transverse relaxation.

G Brix1, L R Schad, W J Lorenz.   

Abstract

The quantitative evaluation of proton density by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is limited as a result of non-uniformities in the intensity distribution of the images and by the fact that only part of the protons of the tissue contribute to the image signal. This study was undertaken to estimate the accuracy of proton density measurements using a standard whole-body MR imager operating at 1.5 T. First, phantom experiments were performed to examine the possibility of an intensity correction. For the test phantom the systematical errors in the computed proton densities were reduced from 5 to 1% after correction. Secondly, proton transverse relaxation curves of biological tissues were measured in vitro on an MR spectrometer. A multi-exponential analysis of the data shows that for spin-echo times TE greater than 10 ms in total between 10 and 30% of the protons of the tissue do not contribute to the image signal. In all tissues a proton component with a free induction decay (FID) time T2* less than 32 microseconds was observed. In the time range TE greater than 10 ms two proton components can be distinguished in muscle and fatty tissue. Finally, it will be shown that a pixel-orientated two-exponential analysis of spin-echo images leads to a much more homogeneous density image than one-exponential computation, since tissue-specific biexponentiality and partial volume effects are taken into account. As a conclusion, the hydrogen density of biological tissues can be evaluated at best with an overall error of 10% from MR images for TE greater than 10 ms. This accuracy is insufficient for a pixel-orientated neutron therapy planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2154829     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/35/1/006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Using adiabatic inversion pulses for long-T2 suppression in ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging.

Authors:  Peder E Z Larson; Steven M Conolly; John M Pauly; Dwight G Nishimura
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Development, validation, and pilot MRI safety study of a high-resolution, open source, whole body pediatric numerical simulation model.

Authors:  Hongbae Jeong; Georgios Ntolkeras; Michel Alhilani; Seyed Reza Atefi; Lilla Zöllei; Kyoko Fujimoto; Ali Pourvaziri; Michael H Lev; P Ellen Grant; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Quantitative bone matrix density measurement by water- and fat-suppressed proton projection MRI (WASPI) with polymer calibration phantoms.

Authors:  Haihui Cao; Jerome L Ackerman; Mirko I Hrovat; Lila Graham; Melvin J Glimcher; Yaotang Wu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Assessment of Myocardial Fibrosis in Mice Using a T2*-Weighted 3D Radial Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequence.

Authors:  Bastiaan J van Nierop; Noortje A M Bax; Jules L Nelissen; Fatih Arslan; Abdallah G Motaal; Larry de Graaf; Jaco J M Zwanenburg; Peter R Luijten; Klaas Nicolay; Gustav J Strijkers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Single-Scan, Rapid Whole-Brain Protocol for Quantitative Water Content Mapping With Neurobiological Implications.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens; Ricardo Loução; Zaheer Abbas; Vincent Gras; Markus Zimmermann; N J Shah
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  An MR technique for simultaneous quantitative imaging of water content, conductivity and susceptibility, with application to brain tumours using a 3T hybrid MR-PET scanner.

Authors:  Yupeng Liao; Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens; Johannes Lindemeyer; Nazim Lechea; Carolin Weiß-Lucas; Karl-Josef Langen; N Jon Shah
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.