Literature DB >> 21547878

Propofol sedation during endoscopy in patients with cirrhosis, and utility of psychometric tests and critical flicker frequency in assessment of recovery from sedation.

P Sharma1, S Singh, B C Sharma, M Kumar, H Garg, A Kumar, S K Sarin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Patients with cirrhosis who undergo endoscopy under sedation could be at increased risk of complications. We assessed the utility of the critical flicker frequency (CFF) in the recovery of cognitive function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study in patients with cirrhosis who underwent endoscopy under sedation with propofol in a tertiary care center. The main outcome was deterioration in cognitive function as measured by the number connection test A and B (NCT-A, -B), digit symbol test (DST), serial dotting test (SDT), and line tracing test (LTT) before and 2 h after endoscopy. CFF was recorded before and then every 30 min after endoscopy for the next 2 h.
RESULTS: In the 108 patients there was no deterioration in results of the psychometric tests after the endoscopy (NCT-A 65.2 ± 44.4 vs. 62.4 ± 43.6 s, P = 0.01; NCT-B 110.4 ± 34.7 vs. 109.6 ± 44.6 s, P = 0.45; DST 26.2 ±1 0.0 vs. 26.7 ± 9.9, P = 0.25; SDT 88.6 ± 47.5 vs. 84.3 ± 44.1 s, P = 0.02; LTT 116.6 ± 55.2 vs. 115.4 ± 51.3 s, P = 0.47.) Patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE; n = 64) did not show any deterioration in cognitive function at 2 h (NCT-A 87.7 ± 45.4 vs. 84.3 ± 44.9 s, P = 0.06; NCT-B 134.8 ± 65.4 vs. 132.7 ± 58.8 s, P = 0.46; DST 21.4 ± 8.9 vs. 22.2 ± 8.8, P = 0.09; SDT 107.1 ± 53.0 vs. 102.7 ± 48.5 s, P = 0.03; and LTT 131.5 ± 62.2 vs. 129.6 ± 57.2 s, P = 0.46). There was a significant difference between CFF at baseline and at 30 min and 1 h but no difference thereafter in non-MHE patients, MHE patients, and in controls. A total of 30 patients (28 %) had CFF < 38 Hz. In these patients, CFF at 2 h did not significantly differ from baseline CFF (35.9 ± 1.5 vs. 36.1 ± 2.0 Hz; P = 0.19). A total of 10 patients (9 %) had transient hypoxemia and 18 (17 %) had hypotension during the procedure. The endoscopy was completed in all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Propofol is safe in patients with cirrhosis and the CFF is a useful tool for the assessment of recovery from sedation in these patients. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21547878     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  17 in total

1.  Early detection of diving-related cognitive impairment of different nitrogen-oxygen gas mixtures using critical flicker fusion frequency.

Authors:  Pierre Lafère; Walter Hemelryck; Peter Germonpré; Lyubisa Matity; François Guerrero; Costantino Balestra
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 0.887

2.  Heart rate variability and critical flicker fusion frequency changes during and after parachute jumping in experienced skydivers.

Authors:  M Cavalade; V Papadopoulou; S Theunissen; C Balestra
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Persistence of critical flicker fusion frequency impairment after a 33 mfw SCUBA dive: evidence of prolonged nitrogen narcosis?

Authors:  C Balestra; P Lafère; P Germonpré
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Useful tests for hepatic encephalopathy in clinical practice.

Authors:  Eiman Nabi; Jasmohan S Bajaj
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014-01

5.  Pharmacodynamic analysis of target-controlled infusion of propofol in patients with hepatic insufficiency.

Authors:  Jing-Ru Pan; Jun Cai; Shao-Li Zhou; Qian-Qian Zhu; Fei Huang; Yi-Han Zhang; Xin-Jin Chi; Zi-Qing Hei
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-10-19

Review 6.  Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current issues.

Authors:  John K Triantafillidis; Emmanuel Merikas; Dimitrios Nikolakis; Apostolos E Papalois
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Propofol is a more effective and safer sedative agent than midazolam in endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ko Watanabe; Takuto Hikichi; Tadayuki Takagi; Rei Suzuki; Jun Nakamura; Mitsuru Sugimoto; Hitomi Kikuchi; Naoki Konno; Mika Takasumi; Yuki Sato; Minami Hashimoto; Hiroki Irie; Katsutoshi Obara; Hiromasa Ohira
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-21

8.  Safety and effectiveness of low-dose propofol sedation during and after esophagogastroduodenoscopy in child A and B cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  Naoki Tanaka; Akira Horiuchi; Yoshiko Nakayama; Yoshihiko Katsuyama; Masatsugu Isobe; Toshifumi Aoyama; Eiji Tanaka; Shigeru Ohmori
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Safety and effectiveness of midazolam for cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic variceal ligation.

Authors:  Hee Bum Jo; Jun Kyu Lee; Dong Kee Jang; Hyoun Woo Kang; Jae Hak Kim; Yun Jeong Lim; Moon-Soo Koh; Jin Ho Lee
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Inhibitory control test, critical flicker frequency, and psychometric tests in the diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Praveen Sharma; Ajay Kumar; Shweta Singh; Pankaj Tyagi; Ashish Kumar
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.