Literature DB >> 21547819

Octanol-water distribution of engineered nanomaterials.

Kiril D Hristovski1, Paul K Westerhoff, Jonathan D Posner.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to examine the effects of pH and ionic strength on octanol-water distribution of five model engineered nanomaterials. Distribution experiments resulted in a spectrum of three broadly classified scenarios: distribution in the aqueous phase, distribution in the octanol, and distribution into the octanol-water interface. Two distribution coefficients were derived to describe the distribution of nanoparticles among octanol, water and their interface. The results show that particle surface charge, surface functionalization, and composition, as well as the solvent ionic strength and presence of natural organic matter, dramatically impact this distribution. Distributions of nanoparticles into the interface were significant for nanomaterials that exhibit low surface charge in natural pH ranges. Increased ionic strengths also contributed to increased distributions of nanoparticle into the interface. Similarly to the octanol-water distribution coefficients, which represent a starting point in predicting the environmental fate, bioavailability and transport of organic pollutants, distribution coefficients such as the ones described in this study could help to easily predict the fate, bioavailability, and transport of engineered nanomaterials in the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21547819     DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2011.562859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng        ISSN: 1093-4529            Impact factor:   2.269


  8 in total

1.  Increasing evidence indicates low bioaccumulation of carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Rhema Bjorkland; David Tobias; Elijah J Petersen
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2017-02-21

2.  Role of nanoparticle surface functionality in the disruption of model cell membranes.

Authors:  Babak Y Moghadam; Wen-Che Hou; Charlie Corredor; Paul Westerhoff; Jonathan D Posner
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.882

3.  Searching for global descriptors of engineered nanomaterial fate and transport in the environment.

Authors:  Paul Westerhoff; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 4.  Preparing (Metalla)carboranes for Nanomedicine.

Authors:  Marta Gozzi; Benedikt Schwarze; Evamarie Hey-Hawkins
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Characterization of Nanoparticle Batch-To-Batch Variability.

Authors:  Sonja Mülhopt; Silvia Diabaté; Marco Dilger; Christel Adelhelm; Christopher Anderlohr; Thomas Bergfeldt; Johan Gómez de la Torre; Yunhong Jiang; Eugenia Valsami-Jones; Dominique Langevin; Iseult Lynch; Eugene Mahon; Inge Nelissen; Jordi Piella; Victor Puntes; Sikha Ray; Reinhard Schneider; Terry Wilkins; Carsten Weiss; Hanns-Rudolf Paur
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 6.  Current Approaches and Techniques in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modelling of Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Wells Utembe; Harvey Clewell; Natasha Sanabria; Philip Doganis; Mary Gulumian
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.076

7.  Development of polyurethane foam dressing containing silver and asiaticoside for healing of dermal wound.

Authors:  Nantaporn Namviriyachote; Vimolmas Lipipun; Yada Akkhawattanangkul; Phingphol Charoonrut; Garnpimol C Ritthidej
Journal:  Asian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 6.598

8.  Adaptive methodology to determine hydrophobicity of nanomaterials in situ.

Authors:  Lauren E Crandon; Kylie M Boenisch; Bryan J Harper; Stacey L Harper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.