Literature DB >> 21547811

Exposure sources and reasons for testing among women with low blood lead levels.

Motao Zhu1, Edward F Fitzgerald, Kitty H Gelberg.   

Abstract

Previous research has focused on highly elevated blood lead (PbB). This study examined reasons for testing and potential sources of exposure among women with PbBs less than 0.72 μmol/l (15 μg/dl). A questionnaire was mailed to 18- to 49-year-old women in upstate New York, USA, who were PbB tested in 2007. The most common testing reason was pregnancy among 125 women who returned the questionnaire. Among women tested for PbB during pregnancy, doctors ordered approximately 80% of tests regardless of lead level. Few women with PbBs less than 0.24 μmol/l (5 μg/dl) reported a potential source of lead exposure. However, among women with PbBs of 0.24-0.71 μmol/L (5-14.9 μg/dl), 29.2% had a job and 21.2% had a hobby with potential lead exposure. There are systematic differences in reasons for testing and exposure sources among women with PbBs less than 0.72 μmol/l and these differences have implications for screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21547811     DOI: 10.1080/09603123.2010.550035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Health Res        ISSN: 0960-3123            Impact factor:   3.411


  3 in total

1.  Exposure to heavy metals in blood and risk perception of the population living in the vicinity of municipal waste incinerators in Korea.

Authors:  Chung Soo Lee; Young Wook Lim; Ho Hyun Kim; Ji Yeon Yang; Dong Chun Shin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Very low maternal lead level in pregnancy and birth outcomes in an eastern Massachusetts population.

Authors:  Meghan Perkins; Robert O Wright; Chitra J Amarasiriwardena; Innocent Jayawardene; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Emily Oken
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  The relationship between blood lead levels and occupational exposure in a pregnant population.

Authors:  Osmel La-Llave-León; José Manuel Salas Pacheco; Sergio Estrada Martínez; Eloísa Esquivel Rodríguez; Francisco X Castellanos Juárez; Ada Sandoval Carrillo; Angélica María Lechuga Quiñones; Fernando Vázquez Alanís; Gonzalo García Vargas; Edna Madai Méndez Hernández; Jaime Duarte Sustaita
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.