| Literature DB >> 21547234 |
W Ray Waters1, Gary E Stevens, Mark A Schoenbaum, Kathy A Orloski, Suelee Robbe-Austerman, N Beth Harris, S Mark Hall, Bruce V Thomsen, Arach J Wilson, Roger E Brannian, Jeffrey T Nelson, Shawn Schafer, Javan Esfandiari, Meghan Dutton, Rena Greenwald, Konstantin P Lyashchenko.
Abstract
In 2009, Mycobacterium bovis infection was detected in a herd of 60 elk (Cervus elaphus) and 50 fallow deer (Dama dama) in Nebraska, USA. Upon depopulation of the herd, the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis (TB) was estimated at ∼71-75%, based upon histopathology and culture results. Particularly with elk, gross lesions were often severe and extensive. One year ago, the majority of the elk had been tested for TB by single cervical test (SCT), and all were negative. After initial detection of a tuberculous elk in this herd, 42 of the 59 elk were tested by SCT. Of the 42 SCT-tested elk, 28 were TB-infected with only 3/28 reacting upon SCT. After SCT, serum samples were collected from the infected elk and fallow deer from this herd at necropsy and tested by three antibody detection methods including multiantigen print immunoassay, cervidTB STAT-PAK, and dual path platform VetTB (DPP). Serologic test sensitivity ranged from 79 to 97% depending on the test format and host species. Together, these findings demonstrate the opportunities for use of serodiagnosis in the rapid detection of TB in elk and fallow deer.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21547234 PMCID: PMC3087612 DOI: 10.4061/2011/953985
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Int ISSN: 2042-0048
History of herd and timeline of the outbreak investigation.
| Action | Date | Number of animals | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elk | Fallow deer | ||
| Original herd size | 2008 | 60 | 50 |
| SCT performed | March 2008 | 50 (all negative) | Not tested |
| Index case detected | January 30, 2009 | 1 | 0 |
| SCT performeda | February/March 2009 | 42/59 tested (3 true positive, 25/39 false negative*) | Not tested |
| Postmortem examinationsb | June 2009 | 52 | 48 |
| Serum collected | June 2009 | 34/52 examined | 32/48 examined |
| Apparent prevalencec | June 2009 | 75% (40/53 TB positive) | 71% (34/48 TB positive) |
aOnly 42/59 elk and none of the fallow deer were tested by SCT primarily due to animal handling and management issues. All of the elk that were tested by SCT were examined postmortem.
bHerd depopulation completed; however, not all of the carcasses were examined.
cThe apparent prevalence includes the index case and is based upon the number of animals with mycobacteriosis compatible gross and microscopic lesions and/or M. bovis isolated from tissues.
*Necropsies were performed 3 months after SCT; thus, values may underestimate the true false negative rate.
Figure 1Gross lesions in elk. (b) demonstrates a tuberculous thoracic lesion that has eroded through the body wall. (a) demonstrates coalescing, multinodular, pulmonary granulomas. Orientation of both photographs: cranial to the left and dorsal to the top.
Figure 2Microscopic lesions in elk. The image is a photograph of a representative pulmonary granuloma in an elk (hematoxylin and eosin stain). Note the large number of neutrophils and the single multinucleate giant cell in the center of the image. The inset image demonstrates an acid-fast bacillus (Ziehl-Neelson stain) in a pool of proteinaceous fluid, necrotic cell debris, and degenerate neutrophils.
Figure 3Antibody responses to recombinant and native antigens detected in elk (a) and fallow deer (b) using a multiantigen print immunoassay. Numbers in lower margins indicate unique animal identification designations. Antigens printed on nitrocellulose are indicated in the right margin. E6/P10 refers to a fusion protein of ESAT-6 and CFP10. 16/83 refers to a fusion protein of the 16kDa protein and MPB83. F10 is a fusion protein consisting of CFP10, secE2, and PhoS1/pstS. B-PPD refers to M. bovis-derived purified protein derivative. MBCF refers to M. bovis-derived culture filtrate antigen.
Diagnostic performance of serological tests in elk.
| Assay | Sensitivitya | Specificityb | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| CervidTB STAT-PAK | 82% (28/34) | 93% (131/141) | 91% (159/175) |
| DPP VetTB | 79% (27/34) | 98% (138/141) | 94% (165/175) |
aElk were considered positive for bovine TB if either M. bovis was isolated upon culture of lesions or mycobacteriosis compatible lesions were detected upon microscopic examination of gross lesions.
bSera from noninfected and SCT-negative elk were obtained from the APHIS, NVSL bovine TB serum bank for evaluation of test specificity.
Diagnostic performance of serological tests in fallow deer.
| Assay | Sensitivitya | Specificityb | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| CervidTB STAT-PAK | 91% (29/32) | 91% (97/107) | 91% (126/139) |
| DPP VetTB | 91% (29/32) | 99% (106/107) | 97% (135/139) |
aFallow deer were considered positive for bovine TB if either M. bovis was isolated upon culture of lesions or mycobacteriosis compatible lesions were detected upon microscopic examination of gross lesions.
bSera from noninfected and SCT-negative fallow deer were obtained from the APHIS, NVSL bovine TB serum bank for evaluation of test specificity.