BACKGROUND: The relationship between CD4 T-cell counts determined soon after seroconversion with HIV-1 (baseline CD4), nadir CD4, and CD4 levels attained during highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is unknown. METHODS: Longitudinal, including baseline (at or soon after HIV diagnosis), intermediate (nadir), and distal (post-HAART) CD4 T-cell counts were assessed in 1085 seroconverting subjects who achieved viral load suppression from a large well-characterized cohort. The association of baseline with post-HAART CD4 T-cell count was determined after adjustment for other relevant covariates. RESULTS: A higher baseline CD4 T-cell count predicted a greater post-HAART CD4 T-cell count, independent of the nadir and other explanatory variables. Together, baseline and nadir strongly predicted the post-HAART CD4 count such that a high baseline and lower nadir were associated with a maximal immune recovery after HAART. Likelihood of recovery of the baseline count after HAART was significantly higher when the nadir/baseline count ratio was consistently ≥ 0.6. CONCLUSIONS: Among viral load suppressing seroconverters, the absolute CD4 T-cell count attained post-HAART is highly dependent on both baseline and nadir CD4 T-cell counts. These associations further support the early diagnosis and initiation of HAART among HIV-infected persons.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between CD4 T-cell counts determined soon after seroconversion with HIV-1 (baseline CD4), nadir CD4, and CD4 levels attained during highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is unknown. METHODS: Longitudinal, including baseline (at or soon after HIV diagnosis), intermediate (nadir), and distal (post-HAART) CD4 T-cell counts were assessed in 1085 seroconverting subjects who achieved viral load suppression from a large well-characterized cohort. The association of baseline with post-HAART CD4 T-cell count was determined after adjustment for other relevant covariates. RESULTS: A higher baseline CD4 T-cell count predicted a greater post-HAART CD4 T-cell count, independent of the nadir and other explanatory variables. Together, baseline and nadir strongly predicted the post-HAART CD4 count such that a high baseline and lower nadir were associated with a maximal immune recovery after HAART. Likelihood of recovery of the baseline count after HAART was significantly higher when the nadir/baseline count ratio was consistently ≥ 0.6. CONCLUSIONS: Among viral load suppressing seroconverters, the absolute CD4 T-cell count attained post-HAART is highly dependent on both baseline and nadir CD4 T-cell counts. These associations further support the early diagnosis and initiation of HAART among HIV-infectedpersons.
Authors: Timothy W Schacker; Ronald J Bosch; Kara Bennett; Richard Pollard; Gregory K Robbins; Ann C Collier; Roy M Gulick; John Spritzler; Donna Mildvan Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2010-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: M M Lederman; R McKinnis; D Kelleher; A Cutrell; J Mellors; M Neisler; E Cooney; D W Haas; R Haubrich; J Stanford; J Horton; A Landay; W Spreen Journal: AIDS Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Peter W Hunt; Steven G Deeks; Benigno Rodriguez; Hernan Valdez; Starley B Shade; Donald I Abrams; Mari M Kitahata; Melissa Krone; Torsten B Neilands; Richard J Brand; Michael M Lederman; Jeffrey N Martin Journal: AIDS Date: 2003-09-05 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Amy C Weintrob; Greg A Grandits; Brian K Agan; Anuradha Ganesan; Michael L Landrum; Nancy F Crum-Cianflone; Erica N Johnson; Claudia E Ordóñez; Glenn W Wortmann; Vincent C Marconi Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Jason F Okulicz; Tuan D Le; Brian K Agan; Jose F Camargo; Michael L Landrum; Edwina Wright; Matthew J Dolan; Anuradha Ganesan; Tomas M Ferguson; Davey M Smith; Douglas D Richman; Susan J Little; Robert A Clark; Weijing He; Sunil K Ahuja Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Maria Pino; Susan Pereira Ribeiro; Amélie Pagliuzza; Khader Ghneim; Anum Khan; Emily Ryan; Justin L Harper; Colin T King; Sarah Welbourn; Luca Micci; Sol Aldrete; Keith A Delman; Theron Stuart; Michael Lowe; Jason M Brenchley; Cynthia A Derdeyn; Kirk Easley; Rafick P Sekaly; Nicolas Chomont; Mirko Paiardini; Vincent C Marconi Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2021-08-27 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Elizabeth Yohannes; Santosh K Ghosh; Bin Jiang; Thomas S McCormick; Aaron Weinberg; Edward Hill; Faddy Faddoul; Mark R Chance Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kahtonna Allen; Octavio Mesner; Anuradha Ganesan; Thomas A O'Bryan; Robert G Deiss; Brian K Agan; Jason F Okulicz Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Victor Leung; Jennifer Gillis; Janet Raboud; Curtis Cooper; Robert S Hogg; Mona R Loutfy; Nima Machouf; Julio S G Montaner; Sean B Rourke; Chris Tsoukas; Marina B Klein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 3.240