Literature DB >> 21546841

Genetic counseling following the detection of hemoglobinopathy trait on the newborn screen is well received, improves knowledge, and relieves anxiety.

Beth Kladny1, Andrea Williams, Ashish Gupta, Elizabeth A Gettig, Lakshmanan Krishnamurti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of newborn screening for hemoglobinopathies is the presymptomatic diagnosis and early treatment of sickle cell disease. Hemoglobinopathy traits detected on the newborn screening provide an opportunity for genetic counseling of families regarding the trait and information that may impact reproductive decisions of the parents. We describe the results of a study to determine the impact of newborn screening and genetic counseling on the lives of families in which an abnormal hemoglobin trait had been identified.
METHODS: From June 2003 to December 2009, families of children with trait attending a clinic visit and receiving professional genetic counseling were asked to participate in a semistructured follow-up survey regarding their experience and the impact of genetic counseling on their families.
RESULTS: Of the 300 patients seen in clinic during the specified time period, 209 consented to be recontacted and 114 have completed the survey. Eighty-five percent of responders reported knowing that the newborn screen had been performed, but only 55% understood the purpose of newborn screening. When asked about the effect of finding out that trait was present in their baby, 19% reported feeling guilty or upset, whereas 4% believed that their partner blamed them for the child's results. That genetic counseling was found to be beneficial was indicated by the fact that 99% reported that their questions were answered, 82% reported feeling less anxious, and 78% discussed the trait with their partner after the appointment.
CONCLUSIONS: Genetic counseling after newborn screening relieves anxiety, provides knowledge, facilitates dialog within families and between partners about hemoglobinopathy trait, and was seen as a positive experience for the majority of responders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21546841     DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821435f7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  8 in total

1.  Genomic counseling in the newborn period: experiences and views of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Monica D Nardini; Anne L Matthews; Shawn E McCandless; Larisa Baumanis; Aaron J Goldenberg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Pregnancy in sickle cell trait: what we do and don't know.

Authors:  Samuel Wilson; Patrick Ellsworth; Nigel S Key
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  A pilot randomized clinical trial evaluating the impact of genetic counseling for serious mental illnesses.

Authors:  Catriona Hippman; Andrea Ringrose; Angela Inglis; Joanna Cheek; Arianne Y K Albert; Ronald Remick; William G Honer; Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.384

4.  Incidence of sickle cell trait--United States, 2010.

Authors:  Jelili Ojodu; Mary M Hulihan; Shammara N Pope; Althea M Grant
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  Sickle cell trait knowledge and health literacy in caregivers who receive in-person sickle cell trait education.

Authors:  Susan Creary; Ismahan Adan; Joseph Stanek; Sarah H O'Brien; Deena J Chisolm; Tanica Jeffries; Kristin Zajo; Elizabeth Varga
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.183

6.  Co-designing Improved Communication of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results to Parents: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Jane Chudleigh; Lynette Shakespeare; Pru Holder; Holly Chinnery; Gemma Hack; Tanya Gill; Rachel Gould; Kevin W Southern; Ellinor K Olander; Stephen Morris; James R Bonham; Alan Simpson; Louise Moody
Journal:  J Particip Med       Date:  2022-07-27

7.  Parents' Experiences of Receiving the Initial Positive Newborn Screening (NBS) Result for Cystic Fibrosis and Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Jane Chudleigh; Sarah Buckingham; Jo Dignan; Sandra O'Driscoll; Kemi Johnson; David Rees; Hilary Wyatt; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Rethinking Strategies for Positive Newborn Screening Result (NBS+) Delivery (ReSPoND): a process evaluation of co-designing interventions to minimise impact on parental emotional well-being and stress.

Authors:  Jane Chudleigh; Jim Bonham; Mandy Bryon; Jill Francis; Louise Moody; Steve Morris; Alan Simpson; Fiona Ulph; Kevin Southern
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2019-09-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.