Literature DB >> 21546820

Forearm bones and sexual variation in Turkish population.

Ibrahim Uzün1, Mehmet Yaşar Işcan, Osman Celbiş.   

Abstract

Forensic anthropologists are aware that there are considerable differences between human populations and therefore develop study models for each skeletal population. The purpose of this study was to analyze forearm bones obtained from forensic settings in Turkey. The sample consists of 42 males and 38 females with an average age of 40 and 36 years, respectively. Numerous measurements were taken from the radius and ulna including lengths (in millimeters), midshaft diameters, and epiphyseal breadths (0.01 mm). Individuals with any anomaly and pathology were not included in the investigation. A stepwise analysis, when applied to individual bones, selected only length and midshaft transverse dimension in the radius and length only in the ulna. When the length was excluded from the statistic, head diameter and distal breadth of the radius and distal minimum head and midshaft anteroposterior diameters of the ulna provided the best predicting functions. Classification results were 92% for the radius and 91% for the ulna. For the incomplete bones, the accuracy rates were about 92% and 83%, respectively. In conclusion, a sex determination was made, in different rates of accuracy, in the human skeleton. Correct assessment can vary among populations. Dimorphism in our region forearm bones is greater than American whites. This supported the hypothesis that human variation is diverse, and population difference should be taken into account when osteometric standards are applied to others. Further studies are needed to understand why the forearm is more dimorphic in Turks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21546820     DOI: 10.1097/PAF.0b013e318219ca74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Forensic Med Pathol        ISSN: 0195-7910            Impact factor:   0.921


  4 in total

1.  Normal Age-Related Alterations on Distal Radius Radiography.

Authors:  Hamid Namazi; Rohallah Khaje
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-10

2.  Sex determination using upper limb bones in Korean populations.

Authors:  Je-Hun Lee; Yi-Suk Kim; U-Young Lee; Dae-Kyoon Park; Young-Gil Jeong; Nam Seob Lee; Seung Yun Han; Kyung-Yong Kim; Seung-Ho Han
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-09-23

3.  Sex determination using humeral dimensions in a sample from KwaZulu-Natal: an osteometric study.

Authors:  Oluwatosin Olalekan Ogedengbe; Sunday Adelaja Ajayi; Omobola Aderibigbe Komolafe; Aung Khaing Zaw; Edwin Coleridge Stephen Naidu; Onyemaechi Okpara Azu
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-09-20

4.  Determination of Gender from Various Measurements of the Humerus.

Authors:  Muhammad Amjad Khan; Humara Gul; Shahid Mansor Nizami
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-01-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.