BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) is a marker of cardiovascular disease derived from ultrasound images of the carotid artery. In most outcome studies, human readers identify and trace the key IMT interfaces. We evaluate an alternate approach using automated edge detection. METHODS: We studied a subset of 5640 participants with an average age 61.7 years (48% men) of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis composed of whites, Chinese, Hispanic, and blacks that are part of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis IMT progression study. Manual tracing IMT (mt-IMT) and edge-detected IMT (ed-IMT) measurements of the far wall of the common carotid artery served as outcome variables for multivariable linear regression models using Framingham cardiovascular risk factors and ethnicity as independent predictors. RESULTS: Measurements of mt-IMT were obtainable in 99.9% (5633/5640) and measurements of ed-IMT were obtainable in 98.9% (5579/5640) of individuals. Average ed-IMT was 0.19 mm larger than mt-IMT. Inter-reader systematic differences (bias) in IMT measurements were apparent for mt-IMT but not ed-IMT. Based on complete data for 5538 individuals, associations of IMT with risk factors were stronger (P<0.0001) for mt-IMT (model r2, 19.5%) than for ed-IMT (model r2, 18.5%). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that this edge-detection process generates IMT values equivalent to manually traced ones because it preserves key associations with cardiovascular risk factors. It also decreases inter-reader bias, potentially making it applicable for use in cardiovascular risk assessment.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) is a marker of cardiovascular disease derived from ultrasound images of the carotid artery. In most outcome studies, human readers identify and trace the key IMT interfaces. We evaluate an alternate approach using automated edge detection. METHODS: We studied a subset of 5640 participants with an average age 61.7 years (48% men) of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis composed of whites, Chinese, Hispanic, and blacks that are part of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis IMT progression study. Manual tracing IMT (mt-IMT) and edge-detected IMT (ed-IMT) measurements of the far wall of the common carotid artery served as outcome variables for multivariable linear regression models using Framingham cardiovascular risk factors and ethnicity as independent predictors. RESULTS: Measurements of mt-IMT were obtainable in 99.9% (5633/5640) and measurements of ed-IMT were obtainable in 98.9% (5579/5640) of individuals. Average ed-IMT was 0.19 mm larger than mt-IMT. Inter-reader systematic differences (bias) in IMT measurements were apparent for mt-IMT but not ed-IMT. Based on complete data for 5538 individuals, associations of IMT with risk factors were stronger (P<0.0001) for mt-IMT (model r2, 19.5%) than for ed-IMT (model r2, 18.5%). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that this edge-detection process generates IMT values equivalent to manually traced ones because it preserves key associations with cardiovascular risk factors. It also decreases inter-reader bias, potentially making it applicable for use in cardiovascular risk assessment.
Authors: S Graf; J Gariepy; M Massonneau; R L Armentano; S Mansour; J G Barra; A Simon; J Levenson Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: D H O'Leary; J F Polak; S K Wolfson; M G Bond; W Bommer; S Sheth; B M Psaty; A R Sharrett; T A Manolio Journal: Stroke Date: 1991-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: H N Hodis; W J Mack; L LaBree; R H Selzer; C Liu; C Liu; P Alaupovic; H Kwong-Fu; S P Azen Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1996-03-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Diane E Bild; David A Bluemke; Gregory L Burke; Robert Detrano; Ana V Diez Roux; Aaron R Folsom; Philip Greenland; David R Jacob; Richard Kronmal; Kiang Liu; Jennifer Clark Nelson; Daniel O'Leary; Mohammed F Saad; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; Russell P Tracy Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Matthias W Lorenz; Joseph F Polak; Maryam Kavousi; Ellisiv B Mathiesen; Henry Völzke; Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen; Dirk Sander; Matthieu Plichart; Alberico L Catapano; Christine M Robertson; Stefan Kiechl; Tatjana Rundek; Moïse Desvarieux; Lars Lind; Caroline Schmid; Pronabesh DasMahapatra; Lu Gao; Kathrin Ziegelbauer; Michiel L Bots; Simon G Thompson Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Joseph F Polak; Wendy S Post; J Jeffrey Carr; Moyses Szklo; Daniel H O'Leary Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2014-06-15 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Amer I Aladin; Elsayed Z Soliman; Dalane W Kitzman; Zeina Dardari; Shereen H Rasool; Joseph Yeboah; Matthew J Budoff; Bruce M Psaty; Pamela Ouyang; Joseph F Polak; Roger S Blumenthal; John W McEvoy; Sanjay K Gandhi; David M Herrington Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Joseph F Polak; Moyses Szklo; Richard A Kronmal; Gregory L Burke; Steven Shea; Anna E H Zavodni; Daniel H O'Leary Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Lin Y Chen; Maarten J G Leening; Faye L Norby; Nicholas S Roetker; Albert Hofman; Oscar H Franco; Wei Pan; Joseph F Polak; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Richard A Kronmal; Aaron R Folsom; Saman Nazarian; Bruno H Stricker; Susan R Heckbert; Alvaro Alonso Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 5.501