Literature DB >> 21546066

Correlation between CA-125 serum level and response by RECIST in a phase III recurrent ovarian cancer study.

Thomas J Herzog1, Jan B Vermorken, Eric Pujade-Lauraine, Diane M Provencher, Agnieszka Jagiello-Gruszfeld, Beihua Kong, Karin Boman, Youn Choi Park, Trilok Parekh, Claudia Lebedinsky, Javier Gómez, Bradley J Monk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in a large phase III recurrent ovarian cancer trial (OVA-301): 1) the concordance between CA-125 level vs. best overall response (OR) and progression-free survival (PFS) determined by radiological assessment 2) the impact of early CA-125 changes over the subsequent radiological response, and 3) the prognostic value of CA-125 response and CA-125 PFS to predict radiological response and PFS.
METHODS: Assessment of response in the entire randomized population was performed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0 (RECIST) and modified Rustin criteria for CA-125 determination.
RESULTS: Most CA-125 decreases were observed in RECIST responders (82% of patients treated with the combination and 74% in the PLD alone). CA-125 progression preceded RECIST progression in 35% of patients with a median lead time of 8.4 weeks. A high concordance rate between CA-125 PFS status at 4 months (PFS4) and CA-125 response as a predictor of PFS4 (87%) and radiological response (79%) was found in the combination, with high positive predictive value for radiological PFS4 (92%) and high negative predictive value for OR (90%). An early CA-125 decrease was predictive for the ultimate response since it was found in a high rate of RECIST responders.
CONCLUSION: Radiological response was preceded by a favorable predictive CA-125 decrease in a high proportion of patients, suggesting that CA-125 evaluation may be an appropriate tool for tumor assessment in patients with ovarian cancer.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21546066     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  6 in total

1.  Ovarian cancer clinical trial endpoints: Society of Gynecologic Oncology white paper.

Authors:  Thomas J Herzog; Deborah K Armstrong; Mark F Brady; Robert L Coleman; Mark H Einstein; Bradley J Monk; Robert S Mannel; J Tate Thigpen; Sharee A Umpierre; Jeannine A Villella; Ronald D Alvarez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Evaluating the prognostic significance of preoperative thrombocytosis in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  S K Allensworth; C L Langstraat; J R Martin; M A Lemens; M E McGree; A L Weaver; S C Dowdy; K C Podratz; J N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Theresa A Lawrie; Andrew Bryant; Alison Cameron; Emma Gray; Jo Morrison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-09

4.  Current status of bevacizumab in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Federica Tomao; Anselmo Papa; Luigi Rossi; Davide Caruso; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Martina Venezia; Silverio Tomao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  The combination of intravenous bevacizumab and metronomic oral cyclophosphamide is an effective regimen for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Emese Zsiros; John R Lurain; Alfred Rademaker; Julian C Schink; Nikki L Neubauer
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 6.  MUC16 (CA125): tumor biomarker to cancer therapy, a work in progress.

Authors:  Mildred Felder; Arvinder Kapur; Jesus Gonzalez-Bosquet; Sachi Horibata; Joseph Heintz; Ralph Albrecht; Lucas Fass; Justanjyot Kaur; Kevin Hu; Hadi Shojaei; Rebecca J Whelan; Manish S Patankar
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 27.401

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.