Literature DB >> 21545909

Increasing incidence of bilateral mastectomies: the patient perspective.

Esther Han1, Nathalie Johnson, Margaret Glissmeyer, Terry Wagie, Bethany Carey, Tammy DelaMelena, Joanne Nelson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have reported increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (CPMs). Understanding patient rationale for the surgical choice may provide insight into this trend.
METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to 350 mastectomy patients identified from a community health system tumor registry.
RESULTS: Two hundred fifty questionnaires were received; of these, 237 had undergone mastectomy. Fifty-two percent had unilateral mastectomy (UM), and 43% had bilateral mastectomies (BMs) (6% for bilateral disease). Women younger than 60 years of age were more likely to choose BM (P = .0046). Those who had CPM were significantly more likely to make the same surgical decision (P < .0001). Reconstruction was performed in 52%, with BM patients more likely to undergo reconstruction (P = .009). Twenty-three (19%) needed unanticipated reoperation for reconstruction complications. CPM had equivalent rates of unanticipated surgery versus UM (P = .64).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients choosing BMs are younger, have equivalent rates of reoperation because of reconstruction complications, and are significantly more satisfied with their decision than those who chose UM.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21545909     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  12 in total

Review 1.  Evolution and update on current devices for prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristina O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

2.  What does risk of future cancer mean to breast cancer patients?

Authors:  Karen Kaiser; Kenzie A Cameron; Jennifer Beaumont; Sofia F Garcia; Leilani Lacson; Margaret Moran; Lindsey Karavites; Chiara Rodgers; Swati Kulkarni; Nora M Hansen; Seema A Khan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Analysis of a Trend Reversal in US Lumpectomy Rates From 2005 Through 2017 Using 3 Nationwide Data Sets.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Robyn N Rubenstein; Kathryn Haglich; Jacqueline J Chu; Shen Yin; Carrie S Stern; Monica Morrow; Babak J Mehrara; Mary L Gemignani; Evan Matros
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 16.681

4.  Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Challenging Considerations for the Surgeon.

Authors:  Peter Angelos; Isabelle Bedrosian; David M Euhus; Virginia M Herrmann; Steven J Katz; Andrea Pusic
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Nora E Carbine; Liz Lostumbo; Judi Wallace; Henry Ko
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-05

6.  Patient Perspectives on the Financial Costs and Burdens of Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Sachiko M Oshima; Sarah D Tait; Christel Rushing; Whitney Lane; Terry Hyslop; Anaeze C Offodile; Stephanie B Wheeler; S Yousuf Zafar; Rachel Greenup; Laura J Fish
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-02-10

7.  Bilateral Breast Reconstruction with Abdominal Free Flaps: A Single Centre, Single Surgeon Retrospective Review of 55 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Peter McAllister; Isabel Teo; Kuen Chin; Boikanyo Makubate; David Alexander Munnoch
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2016-07-18

8.  The Manchester guidelines for contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy.

Authors:  Narendra Nath Basu; G L Ross; D G Evans; L Barr
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 9.  Decision-Making in the Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer: Factors Influencing Women's Choices for Mastectomy and Breast Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Emily Catherine Bellavance; Susan Beth Kesmodel
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: current perspectives.

Authors:  Katharine Yao; Mark Sisco; Isabelle Bedrosian
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2016-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.