Literature DB >> 21545890

Comparison of two methods to assess the effect of age and sex on the risk of car crashes.

Pablo Lardelli-Claret1, Juan de Dios Luna-del-Castillo, Eladio Jiménez-Mejías, José Pulido-Manzanero, Gregorio Barrio-Anta, Miguel García-Martín, José Juan Jiménez-Moleón.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare two methods (direct measurement of exposure and quasi-induced exposure) for assessing the effect of age and sex on the risk of being involved in a car crash in Spain.
METHODS: Spanish crash rates (per 10,000,000 driver-km) for age and sex groups of drivers aged 18-64 years old were obtained for 2004-2007, using information from the Spanish General Traffic Office (census of reported car crashes) and the Spanish Household Survey on Alcohol and Drugs (estimate of the mean km driven for each car driver). The rate ratios estimated by direct exposure estimates were compared to those obtained with the quasi-induced exposure method, which compares the age and sex of responsible and non-responsible drivers involved in the same clean collision (in which only one of the drivers committed a driving infraction).
RESULTS: Both methods detected an increased risk of involvement in a crash for the youngest (18-20 years) and the oldest drivers (60-64 years), compared to middle-aged drivers (45-49 years). However, the rate ratios obtained with the quasi-induced method for the youngest group (2.0 for men, 1.6 for women) were much lower than those obtained with crash rates (13.4 for men, 5.7 for women). Both methods detected a similar increase in the risk of involvement of male drivers compared to women in the youngest age group. This excess risk for men was maintained with increasing age up to 45-49 years when the quasi-induced method was used. However, direct comparisons of crash rates revealed an increased risk of involvement in women compared to men of the same age from 25-29 years onward.
CONCLUSIONS: Both direct measurement of driving exposure and the quasi-induced exposure method detected some well-known patterns of risk associated with driver's age and sex. However, factors that could explain important differences between the two methods deserve attention, especially those related with the excess risk for the youngest drivers as well as sex-related risk.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21545890     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  5 in total

1.  Statistical implications of using moving violations to determine crash responsibility in young driver crashes.

Authors:  Allison E Curry; Melissa R Pfeiffer; Rachel K Myers; Dennis R Durbin; Michael R Elliott
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2013-12-18

2.  Estimating young novice drivers' compliance with graduated driver licensing restrictions: A novel approach.

Authors:  Allison E Curry
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.491

3.  Driver Liability Assessment in Vehicle Collisions in Spain.

Authors:  Almudena Sanjurjo-de-No; Blanca Arenas-Ramírez; José Mira; Francisco Aparicio-Izquierdo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Explaining the Association between Driver's Age and the Risk of Causing a Road Crash through Mediation Analysis.

Authors:  Karoline Gomes-Franco; Mario Rivera-Izquierdo; Luis Miguel Martín-delosReyes; Eladio Jiménez-Mejías; Virginia Martínez-Ruiz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Sex Differences in the Amount and Patterns of Car-Driving Exposure in Spain, 2014 to 2017: An Application of a Quasi-Induced Exposure Approach.

Authors:  José Mateos-Granados; Luis Miguel Martín-delosReyes; Mario Rivera-Izquierdo; Eladio Jiménez-Mejías; Virginia Martínez-Ruiz; Pablo Lardelli-Claret
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.