Literature DB >> 21545869

Predicting intentions not to "drink and drive" using an extended version of the theory of planned behaviour.

Inger Synnøve Moan1, Jostein Rise.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine to what extent the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) extended with moral norm and descriptive norm is able to predict intentions not to drink and drive. We also wanted to examine whether different processes guide intentions among young drivers (35 years and below) versus drivers aged above 35 years, and women's versus men's intentions. Questionnaires were sent to a sample of 4000 people in Norway aged between 18 and 70 years, and were completed by 1025 respondents. Analyses were conducted among those who had a driver's licence and who reported drinking at least 1-2 times per year, resulting in a sample of 879 individuals (46.6% were men, 30.3% were 35 years and younger, M=43.9 years). The results showed that the TPB variables explained 10% of the variance in intentions in the sample as a whole, and that the extension variables added 2% to the explained variance after controlling for the impact of the TPB components. Perceived behavioural control was the strongest predictor of intentions (β=0.24, p<0.001), followed by descriptive norm (β=-0.12, p<0.001), attitude (β=0.09, p<0.01) and moral norm (β=0.08, p<0.05). Several group differences were found. The extended TPB model explained 16% and 5% of men's and women's intentions, respectively, and 26% and 9% of the variance in intentions among young and older drivers, respectively. The practical implications of these results for the development of interventions to encourage drivers not to drink and drive will be outlined.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21545869     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  5 in total

1.  Examining interactions within the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of intentions to engage in cannabis-related driving behaviors.

Authors:  Andrew M Earle; Lucy E Napper; Joseph W LaBrie; Ashley Brooks-Russell; Daniel J Smith; Jennifer de Rutte
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2019-01-25

2.  Change of risk behaviour in young people - the effectiveness of the trauma prevention programme P.A.R.T.Y. considering the effect of fear appeals and cognitive processes.

Authors:  Michael Koehler; Thomas Brockamp; Sebastian Bamberg; Tina Gehlert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Self-reported changes in aggressive driving within the past five years, and during COVID-19.

Authors:  Amanda N Stephens; Steven Trawley; Justin Ispanovic; Sophie Lowrie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  The Relationship between Norms and Risky Driving Behavior: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Siti Hawa Harith; Norashikin Mahmud
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.429

5.  The relationship between explicit and implicit attitudes towards drunk driving.

Authors:  Laila M Martinussen; Laura Petranca; Mikael J Sømhovd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.