Literature DB >> 21545733

Patients visiting the complementary medicine clinic for pain: a cross sectional study.

Roni Peleg1, Orly Liberman, Yan Press, Pesach Shvartzman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical care. The purpose of this study was to characterize patients visiting the complementary medicine clinic for a pain complaint.
METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. The study took place at Clalit Health Services (CHS) complementary clinic in Beer-Sheva, Israel. Patients visiting the complementary clinic, aged 18 years old and older, Hebrew speakers, with a main complaint of pain were included. Patients were recruited consecutively on random days of the month during a period of six months. Main outcome measures were: pain levels, location of pain, and interference with daily activities. Once informed consent was signed patients were interviewed using a structured questionnaire by a qualified nurse. The questionnaire included socio-demographic data, and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).
RESULTS: Three-hundred and ninety-five patients were seen at the complementary medicine clinic during the study period, 201 (50.8%) of them met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 163 (81.1%) agreed to participate in the study and were interviewed. Pain complaints included: 69 patients (46.6%) with back pain, 65 (43.9%) knee pain, and 28 (32.4%) other limbs pain. Eighty-two patients (50.3%) treated their pain with complementary medicine as a supplement for their conventional treatment, and 55 (33.7%) felt disappointed from the conventional medicine experience. Eighty-three patients (50.9%) claimed that complementary medicine can result in better physical strength, or better mental state 51 (31.3%). Thirty-seven patients (22.7%) were hoping that complementary medicine will prevent invasive procedures.
CONCLUSION: Given the high proportion of patients with unsatisfactory pain relief using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), general practitioners should gain knowledge about CAM and CAM providers should gain training in pain topics to improve communication and counsel patients. More clinical research to evaluate safety and efficiency of CAM for pain is needed to provide evidence based counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21545733      PMCID: PMC3097011          DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med        ISSN: 1472-6882            Impact factor:   3.659


  29 in total

1.  Use of complementary and alternative therapies by patients with self-reported chronic back pain: a nationwide survey in Canada.

Authors:  Violaine Foltz; Yvan St Pierre; Sylvie Rozenberg; Michel Rossignol; Pierre Bourgeois; Lawrence Joseph; Viviane Adam; John R Penrod; Ann E Clarke; Bruno Fautrel
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  Who uses complementary and alternative medicine in Israel?

Authors:  Amanda Sue Niskar; Tamar Peled-Leviatan; Noga Garty-Sandalon
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.579

3.  How should complementary practitioners and physicians communicate? A cross-sectional study from Israel.

Authors:  Eran Ben-Arye; Moshe Scharf; Moshe Frenkel
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study.

Authors:  J A Astin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Use of complementary and alternative medicine among adults with chronic diseases: United States 2002.

Authors:  Sharon H Saydah; Mark S Eberhardt
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.579

Review 6.  Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Roger Chou; Laurie Hoyt Huffman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Persistent pain and well-being: a World Health Organization Study in Primary Care.

Authors:  O Gureje; M Von Korff; G E Simon; R Gater
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997-2002.

Authors:  Hilary A Tindle; Roger B Davis; Russell S Phillips; David M Eisenberg
Journal:  Altern Ther Health Med       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.804

9.  The use of CAM and conventional treatments among primary care consulters with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Majid Artus; Peter Croft; Martyn Lewis
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Patterns of complementary and alternative medicine use amongst outpatients in Tokyo, Japan.

Authors:  Satoshi Hori; Iordan Mihaylov; Joana C Vasconcelos; Malcolm McCoubrie
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 3.659

View more
  4 in total

1.  Complementary and Alternative Medicine in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System: Users of Chiropractic, Acupuncture, and Massage Services.

Authors:  Tracy Mccubbin; Karin L Kempe; Arne Beck
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

Review 2.  Manipulative therapy (Feldenkrais, massage, chiropractic manipulation) for neck pain.

Authors:  Christopher Plastaras; Seth Schran; Natasha Kim; Deborah Darr; Mary Susan Chen
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Justifications for using complementary and alternative medicine reported by persons with musculoskeletal conditions: A narrative literature synthesis.

Authors:  Nadia Corp; Joanne L Jordan; Peter R Croft
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Potential factors that influence usage of complementary and alternative medicine worldwide: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mayuree Tangkiatkumjai; Helen Boardman; Dawn-Marie Walker
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2020-11-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.