| Literature DB >> 21545730 |
Anelet Jacobs1, Hafizah Y Chenia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elizabethkingia spp. are opportunistic pathogens often found associated with intravascular device-related bacteraemias and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Their ability to exist as biofilm structures has been alluded to but not extensively investigated.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21545730 PMCID: PMC3112384 DOI: 10.1186/1476-0711-10-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ISSN: 1476-0711 Impact factor: 3.944
Biofilm formation by Elizabethkingia meningoseptica isolates CH2B and NCTC 10016T following incubation at room temperature (~21°C) or 37°C, under static or dynamic conditions in nutrient-poor (EAOB) media or nutrient-rich (TSB), respectively
| Parameters | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
| CH2B | VIB1 | |||||
| 0.23 ± 0.02 | M | 0.07 ± 0.01 | N | 1.34 ± 0.28 | S | |
| 0.31 ± 0.13 | M | 0.16 ± 0.01 | W | 1.01 ± 0.18 | S | |
| 0.44 ± 0.14 | S | 0.25 ± 0.01 | M | 0.11 ± 0.00 | W | |
| 0.56 ± 0.06 | S | 0.26 ± 0.02 | M | 0.14 ± 0.07 | W | |
| 0.38 ± 0.19 | M | 0.11 ± 0.07 | W | 0.30 ± 0.09 | W | |
| 0.46 ± 0.35 | M | 0.27 ± 0.06 | M | 0.37 ± 0.15 | W | |
| 0.84 ± 0.17 | S | 0.36 ± 0.02 | S | 0.34 ± 0.39 | M | |
| 0.90 ± 0.07 | S | 0.42 ± 0.05 | S | 0.27 ± 0.34 | M | |
a Biofilm formation assay data is the mean of three independent experiments carried out in triplicate ± standard deviation following growth in minimal (EAOB) or rich (TSB) media at 21 or 37°C under dynamic or static conditions, respectively.
b Biofilm formation (BF) was classified as non-adherent (N), weakly (W)-, moderately (M)- or strongly (S)-adherent using previously described criteria [12].
Range of coaggregation indices obtained when partnering Elizabethkingia meningoseptica isolates CH2B and NCTC 10016T with 19 diverse bacterial partner isolates
| 37.4 | 2.5 | |
| 2.5 | 33.1 | |
| 32.7 | 37.9 | |
| 31.6 | 45.0 | |
| 18.1 | 39.6 | |
| 38.03 | NTc | |
| 27.5 | 10.6 | |
| 44.3 | 6.9 | |
| 39.5 | 32.3 | |
| YO12 (33.9%) | 36.6 | 42.5 |
| YO19 (16.1%) | 28.9 | 13.0 |
| YO51 (13.9%) | 25.2 | 24.0 |
| YO60 (27.5%) | 18.0 | 38.2 |
| YO64 (20.1%) | 16.7 | 56.5 |
| 77.4 | 47.7 | |
| 70.4 | NT | |
| 37.2 | 75.1 | |
| 44.1 | 40.5 | |
| 46.0 | 65.1 | |
| 82.2 | 68.9 |
a For partner strains, autoaggregation indices were determined using assay described by Malik et al. [16] and are indicated within ().
b Coaggregation indices represent the means of two independent replicate experiments as described by Malik et al. [16] and Basson et al. [11].
c NT refers to not tested.
Reversal and inhibition of autoaggregation and coaggregation following sugar, heat or proteinase K treatment of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica CH2B, L. innocua LMG 13568, and/or L. monocytogenes NCTC 4885
| Treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated | |||
| CH2B |
|
| |
| CH2B | 37.4 | 77.3 | 70.4 |
| CH2B | 68.7 | 96.0 | 89.6 |
| 94.5 | - | - | |
| 87.8 | - | - | |
| CH2B | 56.4 | 86.2 | 95.7 |
| 85.0 | - | - | |
| 95.8 | - | - | |
| CH2B | 20.9 | 33.5 | 12.9 |
| 93.8 | - | - | |
| 97.7 | - | - | |
| CH2B | 25.8 | 38.2 | 5.8 |
| 80.4 | - | - | |
| 94.6 | - | - | |
a Coaggregation indices represent the means of two independent replicate experiments as described by Malik et al. [16] and Basson et al. [11].
Figure 1Microtiter plate adherence of . Bars represent means ± standard deviations for three independent replicate experiments.
Figure 2Light microscope image depicting polar attachment (arrow) of .
Figure 3Light microscope images depicting .
Figure 4Light microscope image depicting the distinctly separate adherence of .