Literature DB >> 21544898

Caregiving styles and attachment orientations in couples facing advanced cancer.

Michal Braun1, Sarah Hales, Lior Gilad, Mario Mikulicer, Anne Rydall, Gary Rodin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examines associations between caregiving styles and caregivers' and patients' attachment orientations among couples facing advanced cancer. Four caregiving styles were examined: proximate, sensitive, controlling, and compulsive.
METHOD: A total of 110 patients with advanced gastrointestinal or lung cancer and their spouse caregivers were recruited. Measures included: the Experiences in Close Relationships Inventory, the Caregiving Questionnaire, and the Demand Subscale from the Caregiving Burden Scale.
RESULTS: Caregivers reported high levels of proximate and sensitive caregiving and moderate levels of controlling and compulsive caregiving. Hierarchical regressions were conducted to examine the contribution of caregivers' and patients' attachment orientations to each caregiving style while controlling for caregiving demands. Both caregiving proximity and sensitive caregiving were negatively associated with caregivers' avoidant attachment. Controlling caregiving was positively related to caregivers' avoidant and anxious attachment orientations. Compulsive caregiving was positively associated with caregiving demand and caregivers' attachment anxiety. In addition, compulsive caregiving was positively associated with patients' attachment avoidance and negatively associated with patients' attachment anxiety.
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated two clusters of ways to provide care: other-oriented and self-oriented. The study revealed that both patients' and caregivers' attachment orientations contributed to caregivers' patterns of caregiving. Insecure attachment orientations and resulting couple interaction patterns of 'demand-withdrawal' and 'avoidance-pursuit' are potential sources of distress that may benefit from exploration in psychotherapeutic interventions for couples facing advanced cancer.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21544898     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  6 in total

1.  Psychological Attachment Orientations of Surrogate Decision-Makers and Goals-of-Care Decisions for Brain Injury Patients in ICUs.

Authors:  Andrea K Knies; Qiang Zhang; Prerak Juthani; Stephanie Tu; Jolanta Pach; Aida Martinez; Joan K Monin; David Y Hwang
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2020-07-06

2.  Family Relationships and Psychosocial Dysfunction Among Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Kathrine G Nissen; Kelly Trevino; Theis Lange; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  "You begin to give more value in life, in minutes, in seconds": spiritual and existential experiences of family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer receiving end-of-life care in Brazil.

Authors:  Andrea Carolina Benites; Gary Rodin; Érika Arantes de Oliveira-Cardoso; Manoel Antônio Dos Santos
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Attachment insecurities, caregiver burden, and psychological distress among partners of patients with heart disease.

Authors:  Simone Zofia Laflamme; Karen Bouchard; Karolina Sztajerowska; Kathleen Lalande; Paul S Greenman; Heather Tulloch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Dyadic Experiences and Psychosocial Management of Couples Facing Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Marie Hasdenteufel; Bruno Quintard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-08

6.  CANCER IN OTHER WORDS? THE ROLE OF METAPHOR IN EMOTION DISCLOSURE IN CANCER PATIENTS.

Authors:  Anne Lanceley; Jill Macleod Clark
Journal:  Br J Psychother       Date:  2013-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.