Literature DB >> 21544843

Calibration and uncertainties in personal exposure measurements of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.

John F B Bolte1, Gerard van der Zande, Jos Kamer.   

Abstract

In the past 5 years radiofrequency personal exposure meters have been used to characterize the exposure during daily activities. We found from calibration tests for the 12 frequency bands of the EME Spy 121 exposimeter in a Gigahertz Transverse Electromagnetic cell and an Open Area Test Site, that these measurements tend to underestimate the actual exposure. Therefore, a maximum frequency-dependent correction factor of 1.1-1.6 should be applied to the electric field. This correction factor consists of three multipliers correcting for calibration, elevation arrival angle, and influence of the body. The calibration correction factor should be determined per exposimeter, as the maximum range of response between exposimeters in a frequency band is 2.4 dB. Since the range of response for different elevation angles could reach 10.2 dB, a strict protocol for wearing the exposimeter during fieldwork should be followed to be able to compare and combine measurements made by different persons in the same microenvironments. Because the influence of the body depends on the azimuth angle of arrival, it may lead to an over- or underestimation. Thus, the body correction factor is an average over the angles and should only be applied in activities involving movement through the full 360° range of random angles of arrival.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21544843     DOI: 10.1002/bem.20677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  10 in total

1.  Electromagnetic field exposure assessment in Europe radiofrequency fields (10 MHz-6 GHz).

Authors:  Peter Gajšek; Paolo Ravazzani; Joe Wiart; James Grellier; Theodoros Samaras; György Thuróczy
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Comparison of statistic methods for censored personal exposure to RF-EMF data.

Authors:  Alberto Najera; Raquel Ramirez-Vazquez; Enrique Arribas; Jesus Gonzalez-Rubio
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  The role of the location of personal exposimeters on the human body in their use for assessing exposure to the electromagnetic field in the radiofrequency range 98-2450 MHz and compliance analysis: evaluation by virtual measurements.

Authors:  Krzysztof Gryz; Patryk Zradziński; Jolanta Karpowicz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Radiofrequency radiation at Stockholm Central Railway Station in Sweden and some medical aspects on public exposure to RF fields.

Authors:  Lennart Hardell; Tarmo Koppel; Michael Carlberg; Mikko Ahonen; Lena Hedendahl
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 5.650

5.  Radiofrequency Exposure Amongst Employees of Mobile Network Operators and Broadcasters.

Authors:  Ian Litchfield; Martie van Tongeren; Tom Sorahan
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band.

Authors:  Silvia de Miguel-Bilbao; Juan Blas; Victoria Ramos
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Design of an ecological momentary assessment study of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and non-specific physical symptoms.

Authors:  Rik P Bogers; John F B Bolte; Jan H Houtveen; Erik Lebret; Rob T van Strien; C Maarten A Schipper; Mehdi Alkadhimi; Christos Baliatsas; Irene van Kamp
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  EMF monitoring-concepts, activities, gaps and options.

Authors:  Gregor Dürrenberger; Jürg Fröhlich; Martin Röösli; Mats-Olof Mattsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  A Personal, Distributed Exposimeter: Procedure for Design, Calibration, Validation, and Application.

Authors:  Arno Thielens; Peter Vanveerdeghem; Patrick Van Torre; Stephanie Gängler; Martin Röösli; Hendrik Rogier; Luc Martens; Wout Joseph
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  A Multi-Band Body-Worn Distributed Radio-Frequency Exposure Meter: Design, On-Body Calibration and Study of Body Morphology.

Authors:  Reza Aminzadeh; Arno Thielens; Sam Agneessens; Patrick Van Torre; Matthias Van den Bossche; Stefan Dongus; Marloes Eeftens; Anke Huss; Roel Vermeulen; René de Seze; Paul Mazet; Elisabeth Cardis; Hendrik Rogier; Martin Röösli; Luc Martens; Wout Joseph
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.