Literature DB >> 21542449

Is psychological distress in people living with cancer related to the fact of diagnosis, current treatment or level of disability? Findings from a large Australian study.

Emily Banks1, Julie E Byles, Richard E Gibson, Bryan Rodgers, Isabel K Latz, Ian A Robinson, Anna B Williamson, Louisa R Jorm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the observed elevated levels of psychological distress in cancer survivors relate specifically to aspects of cancer diagnosis, to treatment or to disability. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING: Self-reported questionnaire data on demographic, health and lifestyle factors and mental health from 89574 Australian men and women aged 45 years or older, sampled from the Medicare database for the 45 and Up Study from 1 February 2006 to 30 April 2008. Logistic regression was used to examine the risk of high levels of psychological distress in relation to cancer diagnosis and disability, adjusting for age, sex, income and education. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: High psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale score > or = 22).
RESULTS: Overall, 7.5% of participants had high levels of psychological distress. Among cancer survivors, the median time since diagnosis was 7.3 years. Compared with people without cancer, the odds ratios (95% CIs) for psychological distress were: 1.17 (1.09-1.26) in people reporting having had any cancer apart from non-melanoma skin cancer; 1.34 (1.08-1.67) in those with cancer diagnosed in the previous year; 1.53 (1.33-1.76) for those reporting treatment for cancer in the previous month and 1.11 (1.03-1.19) for those with cancer but without recent treatment. Using individuals with neither cancer nor disability as the reference group, the adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) for psychological distress was 6.51 (5.95-7.12) in those reporting significant disability but no cancer, 1.14(1.04-1.24) in those without disability but with cancer and 5.81(4.88-6.91) in those with both cancer and disability.
CONCLUSION: The risk of psychological distress in individuals with cancer relates much more strongly to their level of disability than it does to the cancer diagnosis itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21542449     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03931.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  25 in total

1.  The role of depression and emotion regulation on parenting stress in a sample of mothers with cancer.

Authors:  Alessandra Babore; Sonia M Bramanti; Lucia Lombardi; Liborio Stuppia; Carmen Trumello; Ivana Antonucci; Alessandra Cavallo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Risk factors of short-term survival in the aged in elective colon cancer surgery: a population-based study.

Authors:  Susanna Niemeläinen; Heini Huhtala; Anu Ehrlich; Jyrki Kössi; Esa Jämsen; Marja Hyöty
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Attitudes of Surgeons toward Elderly Cancer Patients: A Survey from the SIOG Surgical Task Force.

Authors:  Nicole M Saur; Isacco Montroni; Federico Ghignone; Giampaolo Ugolini; Riccardo A Audisio
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-08-07

4.  Black breast cancer survivors experience greater upper extremity disability.

Authors:  Lorraine T Dean; Angela DeMichele; Mously LeBlanc; Alisa Stephens-Shields; Susan Q Li; Chris Colameco; Morgan Coursey; Jun J Mao
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Prostate cancer-related anxiety in long-term survivors after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Valentin H Meissner; Kathleen Herkommer; Birgitt Marten-Mittag; Jürgen E Gschwend; Andreas Dinkel
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  Characterization of Cancer Patients in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Mix; Carl V Granger; Michael J LaMonte; Paulette Niewczyk; Margaret A DiVita; Richard Goldstein; Jerome W Yates; Jo L Freudenheim
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Validation of QuickDASH outcome measure in breast cancer survivors for upper extremity disability.

Authors:  Mously LeBlanc; Margaret Stineman; Angela DeMichele; Carrie Stricker; Jun J Mao
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Measures of mental, physical, and social wellbeing and their association with death by suicide and self-harm in a cohort of 266,324 persons aged 45 years and over.

Authors:  Annette Erlangsen; Emily Banks; Grace Joshy; Alison L Calear; Jennifer Welsh; Philip J Batterham; Luis Salvador-Carulla
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 9.  Personalized surgical management of colorectal cancer in elderly population.

Authors:  Giampaolo Ugolini; Federico Ghignone; Davide Zattoni; Giacomo Veronese; Isacco Montroni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Physical activity, psychological distress, and receipt of mental healthcare services among cancer survivors.

Authors:  Guixiang Zhao; Chaoyang Li; Jun Li; Lina S Balluz
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.