Literature DB >> 21542113

Economic outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with left main or three-vessel coronary artery disease: one-year results from the SYNTAX trial.

David J Cohen1, Tara A Lavelle, Ben Van Hout, Haiyan Li, Yang Lei, Katherine Robertus, Duane Pinto, Elizabeth A Magnuson, Thomas F Mcgarry, Scott K Lucas, Phillip A Horwitz, Carl A Henry, Patrick W Serruys, Friedrich W Mohr, A Pieter Kappetein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative approaches to revascularization for patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that, despite higher initial costs, long-term costs with bypass surgery (CABG) in multivessel CAD are similar to those for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The impact of drug-eluting stents (DES) on these results is unknown.
METHODS: The SYNTAX trial randomized 1,800 patients with left main or three-vessel CAD to either CABG (n = 897) or PCI using paclitaxel-eluting stents (n = 903). Resource utilization data were collected prospectively for all patients, and cumulative 1-year costs were assessed from the perspective of the U.S. healthcare system.
RESULTS: Total costs for the initial hospitalization were $5,693/patient higher with CABG, whereas follow-up costs were $2,282/patient higher with PCI due mainly to more frequent revascularization procedures and higher outpatient medication costs. Total 1-year costs were thus $3,590/patient higher with CABG, while quality-adjusted life expectancy was slightly higher with PCI. Although PCI was an economically dominant strategy for the overall population, cost-effectiveness varied considerably according to angiographic complexity. For patients with high angiographic complexity (SYNTAX score > 32), total 1-year costs were similar for CABG and PCI, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for CABG was $43,486 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with three-vessel or left main CAD, PCI is an economically attractive strategy over the first year for patients with low and moderate angiographic complexity, while CABG is favored among patients with high angiographic complexity.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21542113     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Bora Toklu; Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-05

2.  Estimates of absolute treatment benefit for individual patients required careful modeling of statistical interactions.

Authors:  David van Klaveren; Yvonne Vergouwe; Vasim Farooq; Patrick W Serruys; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Guidelines versus reality: is coronary stent application in three-vessel disease standard or the exception?

Authors:  Roland Linder; J Zeidler; F Verheyen; J-M Graf von der Schulenburg; A Haverich; T Schilling
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-08-19

4.  Overview of Technical and Cost Considerations in Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  J Raider Estrada; Jonathan D Paul; Atman P Shah; Sandeep Nathan
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2014-03

5.  Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the FREEDOM trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Magnuson; Michael E Farkouh; Valentin Fuster; Kaijun Wang; Katherine Vilain; Haiyan Li; Jaime Appelwick; Victoria Muratov; Lynn A Sleeper; Robin Boineau; Mouin Abdallah; David J Cohen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Cost-Effectiveness of Carotid Plaque MR Imaging as a Stroke Risk Stratification Tool in Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Ajay Gupta; Alvin I Mushlin; Hooman Kamel; Babak B Navi; Ankur Pandya
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Focused Cardiac Ultrasound in Place of Repeat Echocardiography: Reliability and Cost Implications.

Authors:  Vinay Kini; Nidhi Mehta; Jeremy A Mazurek; Victor A Ferrari; Andrew J Epstein; Peter W Groeneveld; James N Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  A value-based analysis of hemodynamic support strategies for high-risk heart failure patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  David Gregory; Dennis J Scotti; Gregory de Lissovoy; Igor Palacios; Simon Dixon; Brijeshwar Maini; William O'Neill
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2013-03

9.  Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance carotid plaque imaging for primary stroke prevention in Canada.

Authors:  Eli Lechtman; Indranil Balki; Kiersten Thomas; Kevin Chen; Alan R Moody; Pascal N Tyrrell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Carotid artery stenosis: cost-effectiveness of assessment of cerebrovascular reserve to guide treatment of asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Ankur Pandya; Ajay Gupta; Hooman Kamel; Babak B Navi; Pina C Sanelli; Bruce R Schackman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.