Literature DB >> 21541947

Primary versus delayed tracheoesophageal puncture for laryngopharyngectomy with free flap reconstruction.

Catherine F Sinclair1, Eben L Rosenthal, Nancy L McColloch, J Scott Magnuson, Reneé A Desmond, Glenn E Peters, William R Carroll.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether postoperative complication rates and speech outcomes differ between patients undergoing primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture following total laryngectomy with free flap reconstruction. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study in a tertiary academic center.
METHODS: Between November 2004 and June 2010, 137 patients underwent total laryngectomy or laryngopharyngectomy with pharyngeal free flap reconstruction for malignant disease. Data was collected on patient and operative demographics, early postoperative complications, speech outcomes, and predictive factors for tracheoesophageal puncture failure.
RESULTS: Thirty patients (22%) had a primary tracheoesophageal puncture performed at the time of laryngectomy, 27 patients (20%) received secondary punctures (>3 months postlaryngectomy), and 80 patients (58%) never received a puncture. Patient and operative demographics were similar between groups (P < .05), apart from proportionately more hypopharyngeal tumors in the "no puncture" group (P < .002). Similar numbers of patients in primary and secondary puncture groups achieved intelligible speech (67% vs. 71%, P = .82) and both groups reported good patient-perceived voice-related quality of life. Salvage surgery and nonpatch radial forearm free flap reconstruction both trended toward increased early postoperative complication rates (P = .09).
CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in the early postoperative complication rate for primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture following total laryngectomy with concurrent free flap reconstruction. Radial forearm patch free flap reconstruction achieves good speech outcomes.
Copyright © 2011 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21541947     DOI: 10.1002/lary.21836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  6 in total

1.  Influence of timing, radiation, and reconstruction on complications and speech outcomes with tracheoesophageal puncture.

Authors:  Sarah A Gitomer; Katherine A Hutcheson; Brandon L Christianson; Madeleine B Samuelson; Denise A Barringer; Dianna B Roberts; Amy C Hessel; Randal S Weber; Jan S Lewin; Mark E Zafereo
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Primary tracheoesophageal puncture with supraclavicular artery island flap after total laryngectomy or laryngopharyngectomy.

Authors:  Rosh K V Sethi; Elliott D Kozin; Allen C Lam; Kevin S Emerick; Daniel G Deschler
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Early risk factors for enlargement of the tracheoesophageal puncture after total laryngectomy: nodal metastasis and extent of surgery.

Authors:  Katherine A Hutcheson; Erich M Sturgis; Jan S Lewin
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-09

Review 4.  Surgical salvage of recurrent cancer of the head and neck.

Authors:  Mark Zafereo
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Rachel Kaye; Christopher G Tang; Catherine F Sinclair
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2017-06-21

6.  Indwelling voice prosthesis insertion after total pharyngolaryngectomy with free jejunal reconstruction.

Authors:  Hirofumi Fukushima; Takeharu Kanazawa; Kazuyoshi Kawabata; Hiroki Mitani; Hiroyuki Yonekawa; Toru Sasaki; Wataru Shimbashi; Akira Seto; Ryousuke Kamiyama; Kiyoshi Misawa; Takahiro Asakage
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.