Literature DB >> 21541126

Modeling the effect of reward amount on probability discounting.

Joel Myerson1, Leonard Green, Joshua Morris.   

Abstract

The present study with college students examined the effect of amount on the discounting of probabilistic monetary rewards. A hyperboloid function accurately described the discounting of hypothetical rewards ranging in amount from $20 to $10,000,000. The degree of discounting increased continuously with amount of probabilistic reward. This effect of amount was not due to changes in the rate parameter of the discounting function, but rather was due to increases in the exponent. These results stand in contrast to those observed with the discounting of delayed monetary rewards, in which the degree of discounting decreases with reward amount due to amount-dependent decreases in the rate parameter. Taken together, this pattern of results suggests that delay and probability discounting reflect different underlying mechanisms. That is, the fact that the exponent in the delay discounting function is independent of amount is consistent with a psychophysical scaling interpretation, whereas the finding that the exponent of the probability-discounting function is amount-dependent is inconsistent with such an interpretation. Instead, the present results are consistent with the idea that the probability-discounting function is itself the product of a value function and a weighting function. This idea was first suggested by Kahneman and Tversky (1979), although their prospect theory does not predict amount effects like those observed. The effect of amount on probability discounting was parsimoniously incorporated into our hyperboloid discounting function by assuming that the exponent was proportional to the amount raised to a power. The amount-dependent exponent of the probability-discounting function may be viewed as reflecting the effect of amount on the weighting of the probability with which the reward will be received.

Keywords:  amount; decision weight; discounting; humans; probability; prospect theory; scaling

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21541126      PMCID: PMC3048357          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes.

Authors:  L Green; J Myerson; P Ostaszewski
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  On the shape of the probability weighting function.

Authors:  R Gonzalez; G Wu
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Area under the curve as a measure of discounting.

Authors:  J Myerson; L Green; M Warusawitharana
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the psychophysical law.

Authors:  S S STEVENS
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-05       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 5.  A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Notes on discounting.

Authors:  Howard Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice.

Authors:  J Myerson; L Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses.

Authors:  Sara J Estle; Leonard Green; Joel Myerson; Daniel D Holt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

9.  On the scaling interpretation of exponents in hyperboloid models of delay and probability discounting.

Authors:  Todd L McKerchar; Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 1.777

  9 in total
  22 in total

1.  Comparing hyperbolic, delay-amount sensitivity and present-bias models of delay discounting.

Authors:  Suzanne H Mitchell; Vanessa B Wilson; Sarah L Karalunas
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Abnormal functional activation and maturation of ventromedial prefrontal cortex and cerebellum during temporal discounting in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Clodagh M Murphy; Anastasia Christakou; Vincent Giampietro; Michael Brammer; Eileen M Daly; Christine Ecker; Patrick Johnston; Debbie Spain; Dene M Robertson; Declan G Murphy; Katya Rubia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Male, But Not Female, Alcohol-Dependent African Americans Discount Delayed Gains More Steeply than Propensity-Score Matched Controls.

Authors:  Joel Myerson; Leonard Green; Carissa van den Berk-Clark; Richard A Grucza
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Mechanisms of Individual Differences in Impulsive and Risky Choice in Rats.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

5.  Discounting of monetary rewards that are both delayed and probabilistic: delay and probability combine multiplicatively, not additively.

Authors:  Ariana Vanderveldt; Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Clinical models of decision making in addiction.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Brent A Kaplan
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  How many impulsivities? A discounting perspective.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Discounting of delayed and probabilistic losses over a wide range of amounts.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson; Luís Oliveira; Seo Eun Chang
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Using crowdsourcing to examine relations between delay and probability discounting.

Authors:  David P Jarmolowicz; Warren K Bickel; Anne E Carter; Christopher T Franck; E Terry Mueller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Choice patterns reveal qualitative individual differences among discounting of delayed gains, delayed losses, and probabilistic losses.

Authors:  Yu-Hua Yeh; Joel Myerson; Michael J Strube; Leonard Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.