| Literature DB >> 21541058 |
Jordi Pla-Franco1, María Gálvez-Llompart, Jorge Gálvez, Ramón García-Domenech.
Abstract
Topological-mathematical models based on multiple linear regression analyses have been built to predict the reaction yields and the anti-inflammatory activity of a set of heterocylic amidine derivatives, synthesized under environmental friendly conditions, using microwave irradiation. Two models with three variables each were selected. The models were validated by cross-validation and randomization tests. The final outcome demonstrates a good agreement between the predicted and experimental results, confirming the robustness of the method. These models also enabled the screening of virtual libraries for new amidine derivatives predicted to show higher values of reaction yields and anti-inflammatory activity.Entities:
Keywords: QSAR analysis; amidine derivatives; anti-inflammatory activity; molecular topology; multilineal regression analysis; yield reaction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21541058 PMCID: PMC3083705 DOI: 10.3390/ijms12021281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1.Synthesis of amidine derivatives.
Reaction yields and anti-inflammatory activity of amidine derivatives synthesized by microwave assisted methods.
| I | 3a | 93 | 36.6 | |
| I | 3b | 91 | 25.4 | |
| I | 3c | 80 | 21.8 | |
| I | 3d | 90 | 32.0 | |
| I | 3f | 85 | 23.9 | |
| II | 4a | 90 | 15.2 | |
| II | 4b | 82 | 22.1 | |
| II | 4c | 80 | 10 | |
| II | 4d | 85 | 31.0 | |
| II | 4e | 93 | 33.8 | |
| II | 4f | 80 | 28.2 | |
| III | 5a | 85 | 28.7 | |
| III | 5b | 86 | 26.8 | |
| III | 5c | 86 | 18.8 | |
| III | 5d | 90 | 28.2 | |
| III | 5f | 85 | 23.6 |
Anti-inflammatory activity at a dose of 50 mg/Kg p.o. [24]. (Ibuprofen, reference drug with AA=39.0%).
Descriptors used in this study.
| Pol | Polarity number | Number of pairs of vertexes at topological distance equal to 3 | [ |
| ATSkv | Moreau-Broto autocorrelation index of order k weighed by Van der Waals volumes | [ | |
| EEigkd | K-st eigenvalue from weighted edge adjacency matrix | K-st eigenvalue from edge adjacency matrix weighted by dipole moments of atoms | [ |
| EEigkr | K-st eigenvalue from weighted edge adjacency matrix | K-st eigenvalue from edge adjacency matrix weighted by the resonance integral | [ |
Experimental and predicted values obtained for each compound analyzed through multilinear regression analysis.
| 3a | 93 | 92 | 92 | 36.6 | 37.1 | 37.2 |
| 3b | 91 | 89 | 88 | 25.4 | 32.6 | 36.4 |
| 3c | 80 | 83 | 83 | 21.8 | 20.7 | 19.9 |
| 3d | 90 | 91 | 91 | 32.0 | 25.9 | 25.2 |
| 3f | 85 | 86 | 86 | 2.9 | 25.6 | 26.4 |
| 4a | 90 | 90 | 90 | 15.2 | 18.7 | 21.6 |
| 4b | 82 | 82 | 82 | 22.1 | 21.1 | 21.0 |
| 4c | 80 | 78 | 78 | 10.0 | 12.2 | 14.1 |
| 4d | 85 | 89 | 89 | 31.0 | 32.0 | 32.1 |
| 4e | 93 | 90 | 89 | 33.8 | 32.0 | 31.7 |
| 4f | 80 | 81 | 82 | 28.2 | 27.0 | 26.4 |
| 5a | 85 | 87 | 87 | 28.7 | 24.1 | 23.3 |
| 5b | 86 | 88 | 89 | 26.8 | 25.8 | 25.8 |
| 5c | 86 | 86 | 86 | 18.8 | 15.2 | 13.9 |
| 5d | 90 | 86 | 86 | 28.2 | 30.6 | 30.9 |
| 5f | 85 | 83 | 83 | 23.6 | 23.3 | 23.2 |
From reference [24];
Calculated from Equation (1);
From cross-validation with Equation (1);
Calculated from Equation (2);
From cross-validation with Equation (2).
Figure 2.Graphic representation of logYieldexp versus logYieldcalc and logAAexp versus logAAcalc from the topological models selected.
Figure 3.Graphic representation of cross-validated residuals versus residual for the topological models selected.
Figure 4.Graphic representation of the prediction coefficient, Q2, versus correlation coefficient, r2, obtained by randomization study with yield (left panel) and anti-inflammatory activity (right panel) shown. Black point: selected model.
Computational screening applied to heterocyclic amidine derivatives and selection of theoretically anti-inflammatory compounds with high reaction yield.
| II | 6a | 89.3 | 31.1 | |
| II | 6b | 95.9 | 31.4 | |
| II | 6c | 97.8 | 31.4 | |
| II | 6d | 98.2 | 31.6 | |
| II | 7a | 80.3 | 29.8 | |
| II | 7b | 89.5 | 27.2 | |
| II | 7c | 72.7 | 42.2 | |
| II | 7d | 93.8 | 65.3 | |
| II | 7e | 94.9 | 69.9 | |
| II | 7f | 86.0 | 57.9 | |
| II | 7g | 85.3 | 56.1 | |
| II | 8a | 96.3 | 67.1 | |
| II | 8b | 96.2 | 59.3 | |
| II | 8c | 83.9 | 47.5 | |
| II | 8d | 85.7 | 48.9 |
Calculated from Equation (1);
Calculated from Equation (2).