Literature DB >> 21540246

Endometrial receptivity is affected in women with high circulating progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase: a functional genomics analysis.

E Labarta1, J A Martínez-Conejero, P Alamá, J A Horcajadas, A Pellicer, C Simón, E Bosch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elevated serum progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) leads to a poorer ongoing pregnancy rate in IVF cycles due to reduced endometrial receptivity. The objective of this study was to use microarray technology to compare endometrial gene expression profiles at the window of implantation according to the levels of circulating progesterone.
METHODS: For this prospective cohort study, microarray data were obtained from endometrial biopsies from 12 young healthy oocyte donors undergoing COS with pituitary suppression by either gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or antagonists, and recombinant FSH. On the day of recombinant chorionic gonadotrophin (rCG) administration, six women had serum progesterone levels (P) >1.5 ng/ml (study group) and six had serum P levels <1.5 ng/ml (control group). Endometrial samples were collected using a Pipelle catheter 7 days after the rCG injection.
RESULTS: Using the parametric test, we identified 140 genes significantly dysregulated (64 up- and 76 down-regulated) in the study group endometria compared with the control endometria, regardless of the GnRH analogue employed. These genes are related to cell adhesion, developmental processes, the immune system and others, which are all required for normal endometrial function development. Of the 25 gene targets previously proposed as markers for endometrial receptivity, 13 appeared over-regulated in the study group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal that elevated progesterone levels on the day of rCG administration can induce significant alterations in the gene expression profile of the endometrium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21540246     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  83 in total

1.  Agonist depot versus OCP programming of frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis of freeze-all cycles.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Murat Berkkanoglu; Hasan Bulut; Peter Humaidan; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  In vitro evidence that platelet-rich plasma stimulates cellular processes involved in endometrial regeneration.

Authors:  Lusine Aghajanova; Sahar Houshdaran; Shaina Balayan; Evelina Manvelyan; Juan C Irwin; Heather G Huddleston; Linda C Giudice
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  The way toward adulthood for females with nonclassic congenital adrenal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Georgia Ntali; Sokratis Charisis; Christo F Kylafi; Evangelia Vogiatzi; Lina Michala
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  Timing luteal support in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew T Connell; Jennifer M Szatkowski; Nancy Terry; Alan H DeCherney; Anthony M Propst; Micah J Hill
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Association of number of retrieved oocytes with live birth rate and birth weight: an analysis of 231,815 cycles of in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Valerie L Baker; Morton B Brown; Barbara Luke; Kirk P Conrad
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Why more is less and less is more when it comes to ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  Zeev Blumenfeld
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Revisiting the progesterone to oocyte ratio.

Authors:  Micah J Hill; Mae Wu Healy; Kevin S Richter; Eric Widra; Eric D Levens; Alan H DeCherney; George Patounakis; Brian W Whitcomb
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Endometriosis, endocrine disrupters, and epigenetics: an investigation into the complex interplay in women with polybrominated biphenyl exposure and endometriosis.

Authors:  Sabrina A Gerkowicz; Sarah W Curtis; Anna K Knight; Dawayland O Cobb; Jessica B Spencer; Karen N Conneely; Metrecia L Terrell; Michele Marcus; Alica K Smith
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  What is the contribution of embryo-endometrial asynchrony to implantation failure?

Authors:  Wan-Tinn Teh; John McBain; Peter Rogers
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  The slow growing embryo and premature progesterone elevation: compounding factors for embryo-endometrial asynchrony.

Authors:  Mae Wu Healy; Meghan Yamasaki; George Patounakis; Kevin S Richter; Kate Devine; Alan H DeCherney; Micah J Hill
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.