Literature DB >> 21540108

Comparative pharmacokinetics between a microdose and therapeutic dose for clarithromycin, sumatriptan, propafenone, paracetamol (acetaminophen), and phenobarbital in human volunteers.

Graham Lappin1, Yoko Shishikura, Roeline Jochemsen, Richard John Weaver, Charlotte Gesson, J Brian Houston, Berend Oosterhuis, Ole J Bjerrum, Grzegorz Grynkiewicz, Jane Alder, Malcolm Rowland, Colin Garner.   

Abstract

A clinical study was conducted to assess the ability of a microdose (100 μg) to predict the human pharmacokinetics (PK) following a therapeutic dose of clarithromycin, sumatriptan, propafenone, paracetamol (acetaminophen) and phenobarbital, both within the study and by reference to the existing literature on these compounds and to explore the source of any nonlinearity if seen. For each drug, 6 healthy male volunteers were dosed with 100 μg (14)C-labelled compound. For clarithromycin, sumatriptan, and propafenone this labelled dose was administered alone, i.e. as a microdose, orally and intravenously (iv) and as an iv tracer dose concomitantly with an oral non-labelled therapeutic dose, in a 3-way cross over design. The oral therapeutic doses were 250, 50, and 150 mg, respectively. Paracetamol was given as the labelled microdose orally and iv using a 2-way cross over design, whereas phenobarbital was given only as the microdose orally. Plasma concentrations of total (14)C and parent drug were measured using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) or HPLC followed by AMS. Plasma concentrations following non-(14)C-labelled oral therapeutic doses were measured using either HPLC-electrochemical detection (clarithromycin) or HPLC-UV (sumatriptan, propafenone). For all five drugs an oral microdose predicted reasonably well the PK, including the shape of the plasma profile, following an oral therapeutic dose. For clarithromycin, sumatriptan, and propafenone, one parameter, oral bioavailability, was marginally outside of the normally acceptable 2-fold prediction interval around the mean therapeutic dose value. For clarithromycin, sumatriptan and propafenone, data obtained from an oral and iv microdose were compared within the same cohort of subjects used in the study, as well as those reported in the literature. For paracetamol (oral and iv) and phenobarbital (oral), microdose data were compared with those reported in the literature only. Where 100 μg iv (14)C-doses were given alone and with an oral non-labelled therapeutic dose, excellent accord between the PK parameters was observed indicating that the disposition kinetics of the drugs tested were unaffected by the presence of therapeutic concentrations. This observation implies that any deviation from linearity following the oral therapeutic doses occurs during the absorption process.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21540108     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2011.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0928-0987            Impact factor:   4.384


  19 in total

1.  To Apply Microdosing or Not? Recommendations to Single Out Compounds with Non-Linear Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Sieto Bosgra; Maria L H Vlaming; Wouter H J Vaes
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Theoretical explanation for the pharmaceutical incompatibility through the cooperativity effect of the drug-drug intermolecular interactions in the phenobarbital∙∙∙paracetamol∙∙∙H2O complex.

Authors:  Fei-Peng Zhai; Hong-En Wei; Yi Liu; Feng-Yun Hu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Safety and pharmacokinetics of the CIME combination of drugs and their metabolites after a single oral dosing in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Natacha Lenuzza; Xavier Duval; Grégory Nicolas; Etienne Thévenot; Sylvie Job; Orianne Videau; Céline Narjoz; Marie-Anne Loriot; Philippe Beaune; Laurent Becquemont; France Mentré; Christian Funck-Brentano; Loubna Alavoine; Philippe Arnaud; Marcel Delaforge; Henri Bénech
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  Clarithromycin, Midazolam, and Digoxin: Application of PBPK Modeling to Gain New Insights into Drug-Drug Interactions and Co-medication Regimens.

Authors:  Daniel Moj; Nina Hanke; Hannah Britz; Sebastian Frechen; Tobias Kanacher; Thomas Wendl; Walter Emil Haefeli; Thorsten Lehr
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 5.  Phase 0/microdosing approaches: time for mainstream application in drug development?

Authors:  Tal Burt; Graeme Young; Wooin Lee; Hiroyuki Kusuhara; Oliver Langer; Malcolm Rowland; Yuichi Sugiyama
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  A human microdose study of the antimalarial drug GSK3191607 in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Malek Okour; Geo Derimanov; Rodger Barnett; Esther Fernandez; Santiago Ferrer; Stephanie Gresham; Mohammad Hossain; Francisco-Javier Gamo; Gavin Koh; Adrian Pereira; Katie Rolfe; Deborah Wong; Graeme Young; Harshad Rami; John Haselden
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Predictive Value of Microdose Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Merel van Nuland; Hilde Rosing; Alwin D R Huitema; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Human absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion properties of drug molecules: a plethora of approaches.

Authors:  Claire Beaumont; Graeme C Young; Tom Cavalier; Malcolm A Young
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Microdosing and drug development: past, present and future.

Authors:  Graham Lappin; Robert Noveck; Tal Burt
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.481

10.  A microdose study of ¹⁴C-AR-709 in healthy men: pharmacokinetics, absolute bioavailability and concentrations in key compartments of the lung.

Authors:  G Lappin; M J Boyce; T Matzow; S Lociuro; M Seymour; S J Warrington
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.