PURPOSE: The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) Project conducts near real-time vaccine safety surveillance using sequential analytic methods. Timely surveillance is critical in identifying potential safety problems and preventing additional exposure before most vaccines are administered. For vaccines that are administered during a short period, such as influenza vaccines, timeliness can be improved by undertaking analyses while risk windows following vaccination are ongoing and by accommodating predictable and unpredictable data accrual delays. We describe practical solutions to these challenges, which were adopted by the VSD Project during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccine safety surveillance in 2009/2010. METHODS: Adjustments were made to two sequential analytic approaches. The Poisson-based approach compared the number of pre-defined adverse events observed following vaccination with the number expected using historical data. The expected number was adjusted for the proportion of the risk window elapsed and the proportion of inpatient data estimated to have accrued. The binomial-based approach used a self-controlled design, comparing the observed numbers of events in risk versus comparison windows. Events were included in analysis only if they occurred during a week that had already passed for both windows. RESULTS: Analyzing data before risk windows fully elapsed improved the timeliness of safety surveillance. Adjustments for data accrual lags were tailored to each data source and avoided biasing analyses away from detecting a potential safety problem, particularly early during surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: The timeliness of vaccine and drug safety surveillance can be improved by properly accounting for partially elapsed windows and data accrual delays.
PURPOSE: The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) Project conducts near real-time vaccine safety surveillance using sequential analytic methods. Timely surveillance is critical in identifying potential safety problems and preventing additional exposure before most vaccines are administered. For vaccines that are administered during a short period, such as influenza vaccines, timeliness can be improved by undertaking analyses while risk windows following vaccination are ongoing and by accommodating predictable and unpredictable data accrual delays. We describe practical solutions to these challenges, which were adopted by the VSD Project during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccine safety surveillance in 2009/2010. METHODS: Adjustments were made to two sequential analytic approaches. The Poisson-based approach compared the number of pre-defined adverse events observed following vaccination with the number expected using historical data. The expected number was adjusted for the proportion of the risk window elapsed and the proportion of inpatient data estimated to have accrued. The binomial-based approach used a self-controlled design, comparing the observed numbers of events in risk versus comparison windows. Events were included in analysis only if they occurred during a week that had already passed for both windows. RESULTS: Analyzing data before risk windows fully elapsed improved the timeliness of safety surveillance. Adjustments for data accrual lags were tailored to each data source and avoided biasing analyses away from detecting a potential safety problem, particularly early during surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: The timeliness of vaccine and drug safety surveillance can be improved by properly accounting for partially elapsed windows and data accrual delays.
Authors: James G Donahue; Burney A Kieke; Edwin M Lewis; Eric S Weintraub; Kayla E Hanson; David L McClure; Elizabeth R Vickers; Julianne Gee; Matthew F Daley; Frank DeStefano; Rulin C Hechter; Lisa A Jackson; Nicola P Klein; Allison L Naleway; Jennifer C Nelson; Edward A Belongia Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Taliser R Avery; Martin Kulldorff; Yury Vilk; Lingling Li; T Craig Cheetham; Sascha Dublin; Robert L Davis; Liyan Liu; Lisa Herrinton; Jeffrey S Brown Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Jennifer C Nelson; Robert Wellman; Onchee Yu; Andrea J Cook; Judith C Maro; Rita Ouellet-Hellstrom; Denise Boudreau; James S Floyd; Susan R Heckbert; Simone Pinheiro; Marsha Reichman; Azadeh Shoaibi Journal: EGEMS (Wash DC) Date: 2016-09-06
Authors: Weiling Katherine Yih; Martin Kulldorff; Sukhminder K Sandhu; Lauren Zichittella; Judith C Maro; David V Cole; Robert Jin; Alison Tse Kawai; Meghan A Baker; Chunfu Liu; Cheryl N McMahill-Walraven; Mano S Selvan; Richard Platt; Michael D Nguyen; Grace M Lee Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 2.890