BACKGROUND: It is still not known which patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to previous pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin therapy can benefit from re-treatment. METHODS: Seventy-four patients (HCV genotype 1, n = 56, genotype 2, n = 18) were re-treated with Peg-IFN plus ribavirin. RESULTS: On re-treatment, the sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was 41% for genotype 1 and 56% for genotype 2. With genotype 1, the factors associated with an SVR were previous treatment response and the serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA level at the start of re-treatment. Patients with a ≥ 2-log decrease in HCV RNA at week 12 (partial early virologic response, p-EVR) in previous treatment had significantly higher SVR rates than those without these decreases (p < 0.001); no patient without a p-EVR in the previous treatment attained an SVR with re-treatment (0/16). All patients with <5 log(10) IU/ml of HCV RNA at the start of re-treatment attained an SVR (6/6), while only 33% (15/45) of those patients with ≥ 5 log(10) IU/ml of HCV RNA attained an SVR (p < 0.01). Among the patients with relapse in the previous treatment, those who attained an SVR on re-treatment required a longer duration of re-treatment than the duration of the previous treatment (re-treatment, 63.8 ± 13.0 weeks vs. previous treatment, 53.9 ± 13.5 weeks, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Re-treatment of genotype 1 patients should be limited to patients with a p-EVR in the previous treatment and a low HCV RNA level at the start of re-treatment. In re-treatment with Peg-IFN plus ribavirin, longer treatment duration can contribute to increasing the anti-viral effect.
BACKGROUND: It is still not known which patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to previous pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin therapy can benefit from re-treatment. METHODS: Seventy-four patients (HCV genotype 1, n = 56, genotype 2, n = 18) were re-treated with Peg-IFN plus ribavirin. RESULTS: On re-treatment, the sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was 41% for genotype 1 and 56% for genotype 2. With genotype 1, the factors associated with an SVR were previous treatment response and the serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA level at the start of re-treatment. Patients with a ≥ 2-log decrease in HCV RNA at week 12 (partial early virologic response, p-EVR) in previous treatment had significantly higher SVR rates than those without these decreases (p < 0.001); no patient without a p-EVR in the previous treatment attained an SVR with re-treatment (0/16). All patients with <5 log(10) IU/ml of HCV RNA at the start of re-treatment attained an SVR (6/6), while only 33% (15/45) of those patients with ≥ 5 log(10) IU/ml of HCV RNA attained an SVR (p < 0.01). Among the patients with relapse in the previous treatment, those who attained an SVR on re-treatment required a longer duration of re-treatment than the duration of the previous treatment (re-treatment, 63.8 ± 13.0 weeks vs. previous treatment, 53.9 ± 13.5 weeks, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Re-treatment of genotype 1 patients should be limited to patients with a p-EVR in the previous treatment and a low HCV RNA level at the start of re-treatment. In re-treatment with Peg-IFN plus ribavirin, longer treatment duration can contribute to increasing the anti-viral effect.
Authors: Paul H Hayashi; Carlos Mehia; H Joachim Reimers; Harvey S Solomon; Bruce R Bacon Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Alexander J Thompson; Andrew J Muir; Mark S Sulkowski; Dongliang Ge; Jacques Fellay; Kevin V Shianna; Thomas Urban; Nezam H Afdhal; Ira M Jacobson; Rafael Esteban; Fred Poordad; Eric J Lawitz; Jonathan McCone; Mitchell L Shiffman; Greg W Galler; William M Lee; Robert Reindollar; John W King; Paul Y Kwo; Reem H Ghalib; Bradley Freilich; Lisa M Nyberg; Stefan Zeuzem; Thierry Poynard; David M Vock; Karen S Pieper; Keyur Patel; Hans L Tillmann; Stephanie Noviello; Kenneth Koury; Lisa D Pedicone; Clifford A Brass; Janice K Albrecht; David B Goldstein; John G McHutchison Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: John G McHutchison; Gregory T Everson; Stuart C Gordon; Ira M Jacobson; Mark Sulkowski; Robert Kauffman; Lindsay McNair; John Alam; Andrew J Muir Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: K Ikezawa; M Naito; T Yumiba; K Iwahashi; Y Onishi; H Kita; A Nishio; T Kanno; T Matsuura; A Ono; M Chiba; T Mizuno; H Aketa; K Maeda; T Michida; K Katayama Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: Vijayaprakash Suppiah; Max Moldovan; Golo Ahlenstiel; Thomas Berg; Martin Weltman; Maria Lorena Abate; Margaret Bassendine; Ulrich Spengler; Gregory J Dore; Elizabeth Powell; Stephen Riordan; David Sheridan; Antonina Smedile; Vincenzo Fragomeli; Tobias Müller; Melanie Bahlo; Graeme J Stewart; David R Booth; Jacob George Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-09-13 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: David L Thomas; Chloe L Thio; Maureen P Martin; Ying Qi; Dongliang Ge; Colm O'Huigin; Judith Kidd; Kenneth Kidd; Salim I Khakoo; Graeme Alexander; James J Goedert; Gregory D Kirk; Sharyne M Donfield; Hugo R Rosen; Leslie H Tobler; Michael P Busch; John G McHutchison; David B Goldstein; Mary Carrington Journal: Nature Date: 2009-10-08 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ewa Janczewska; Dorota Zarębska-Michaluk; Hanna Berak; Anna Piekarska; Andrzej Gietka; Dorota Dybowska; Włodzimierz Mazur; Teresa Belica-Wdowik; Witold Dobracki; Magdalena Tudrujek-Zdunek; Zbigniew Deroń; Iwona Buczyńska; Marek Sitko; Agnieszka Czauż-Andrzejuk; Beata Lorenc; Jolanta Białkowska-Warzecha; Jolanta Citko; Łukasz Laurans; Jerzy Jaroszewicz; Łukasz Socha; Olga Tronina; Brygida Adamek; Andrzej Horban; Waldemar Halota; Barbara Baka-Ćwierz; Krzysztof Tomasiewicz; Krzysztof Simon; Aleksander Garlicki; Marta Wawrzynowicz-Syczewska; Robert Flisiak Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 3.090