BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric carcinomas (GC) constitute a distinct clinicopathological entity of gastric cancer. In order to determine underlying distinct aberrant promoter methylation we tested cardiac and non-cardiac GC with regard to the presence of EBV. METHODS: One hundred GC were tested by RNA- in situ hybridization for the presence of EBV by EBV-encoded small RNA (EBER). Aberrant promoter methylation was investigated by methylation-specific real-time PCR for p16, p14, APC and hMLH1. P16 protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In our selected study cohort, EBER-transcripts were detected in 19.6% (18/92) of GC. EBV-positive GC revealed significantly more often gene hypermethylation of p16, p14 and APC (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.02, respectively) than EBV-negative GC. The majority of GC with p16 hypermethylation showed a p16 protein loss (22/28). In contrast, no correlation between the presence of EBV and hMLH1 hypermethylation was found (p = 0.7). EBV-positive GC showed a trend towards non-cardiac location (p = 0.06) and lower stages (I/II) according to the WHO (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes is significantly more frequent in EBV-associated GC compared to EBV-negative GC. Our data add new insights to the role of EBV in gastric carcinogenesis and underline that EBV associated GC comprise a distinct molecular-pathologic as well as a distinct clinicopathological entity of GC.
BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric carcinomas (GC) constitute a distinct clinicopathological entity of gastric cancer. In order to determine underlying distinct aberrant promoter methylation we tested cardiac and non-cardiac GC with regard to the presence of EBV. METHODS: One hundred GC were tested by RNA- in situ hybridization for the presence of EBV by EBV-encoded small RNA (EBER). Aberrant promoter methylation was investigated by methylation-specific real-time PCR for p16, p14, APC and hMLH1. P16 protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In our selected study cohort, EBER-transcripts were detected in 19.6% (18/92) of GC. EBV-positive GC revealed significantly more often gene hypermethylation of p16, p14 and APC (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.02, respectively) than EBV-negative GC. The majority of GC with p16 hypermethylation showed a p16 protein loss (22/28). In contrast, no correlation between the presence of EBV and hMLH1 hypermethylation was found (p = 0.7). EBV-positive GC showed a trend towards non-cardiac location (p = 0.06) and lower stages (I/II) according to the WHO (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes is significantly more frequent in EBV-associated GC compared to EBV-negative GC. Our data add new insights to the role of EBV in gastric carcinogenesis and underline that EBV associated GC comprise a distinct molecular-pathologic as well as a distinct clinicopathological entity of GC.
Authors: Mario Sarbia; Axel zur Hausen; Marcus Feith; Helene Geddert; Burkhard H A von Rahden; Rupert Langer; Claus von Weyhern; J Rüdiger Siewert; Heinz Höfler; Hubert J Stein Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2005-11-20 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Maria D Begnami; Andre L Montagnini; Andre L Vettore; Sueli Nonogaki; Mariana Brait; Alex Y Simoes-Sato; Andrea Q A Seixas; Fernando A Soares Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-08-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: A zur Hausen; N C van Grieken; G A Meijer; M A Hermsen; E Bloemena; S G Meuwissen; J P Baak; C J Meijer; E J Kuipers; A J van den Brule Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 22.682