Literature DB >> 21537975

Validation of navigation assisted cup placement in total hip arthroplasty.

M Ajith Kumar1, M Shantharam Shetty, Kanthi G Kiran, Abhishek R Kini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Computer navigation has the potential to provide precise intraoperative knowledge to the surgeon. Previous studies with navigation have confirmed its function for improved component position but few studies have reported the accuracy and precision of navigation system in clinical use. With this study we propose to evaluate the efficacy of navigation in guiding cup placement.
METHODS: Fifty-six patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty were prospectively included in this study. Stryker imageless navigation system which is accurate to 0.5° was used in all cases. Intraoperative data was collected for the acetabular component position using navigation for the freehand cup placement and the final cup placement done using navigation. Postoperative evaluation of component position was done with computed tomography (CT) and the deviation from intraoperative freehand and navigation values were calculated.
RESULTS: The mean inclination of the freehand reading was 39.5° (range, 20°-58°), mean version of freehand reading was 10.7° (-6°- 27°), and the mean navigation reading was 43.2° (37°-49°) for inclination and 13.0° (-8° - 24°) for version. On postoperative CT scan analysis the mean inclination was 45.3° (34°-56°) and mean version was 15.1° (4°-25°). The deviation of the freehand inclination from the post operative CT scan reading was 11.4° (1°-30°) and the version deviated by a mean of 10.8° (2°-26°). The deviation of the navigation reading from the CT scan reading had a mean of 5.3° (1°-13°) for inclination and 5.6° (1°-17°) for version.
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the navigation system over conventional freehand cup placement is validated by this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21537975      PMCID: PMC3251664          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1268-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  23 in total

1.  Virtual reality computer animation of the effect of component position and design on stability after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R L Barrack; C Lavernia; M Ries; R Thornberry; E Tozakoglou
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket.

Authors:  Anthony M Digioia; Branislav Jaramaz; Anton Y Plakseychuk; James E Moody; Constantinos Nikou; Richard S Labarca; Timothy J Levison; Frederic Picard
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study.

Authors:  T Leenders; D Vandevelde; G Mahieu; R Nuyts
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2002

4.  Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system.

Authors:  Michael Nogler; Oliver Kessler; Alexandra Prassl; Bill Donnelly; Robert Streicher; John B Sledge; Martin Krismer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A cadaveric study of posterior dislocation after total hip replacement-effects of head diameter and acetabular anteversion.

Authors:  Fu Yuen Ng; Jiang Tao Zhang; Kwong Yuen Chiu; Chun Hoi Yan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The nine and ten year results of the low-friction arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  J Charnley; Z Cupic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.

Authors:  D D D'Lima; A G Urquhart; K O Buehler; R H Walker; C W Colwell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The Frank Stinchfield Award: Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning.

Authors:  M Maruyama; J R Feinberg; W N Capello; J A D'Antonio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement.

Authors:  Brigitte M Jolles; Patrick Genoud; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning--a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  G Saxler; A Marx; D Vandevelde; U Langlotz; M Tannast; M Wiese; U Michaelis; G Kemper; P A Grützner; R Steffen; M von Knoch; T Holland-Letz; K Bernsmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  6 in total

1.  Intra- and extra-articular planes of reference for use in total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Jerome Hausselle; Pierre Etienne Moreau; Loic Wessely; Emmanuel de Thomasson; Ayman Assi; Sebastien Parratte; Jerome Essig; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Anteroposterior Radiographs Are More Accurate than Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs for Acetabular Anteversion Assessment: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Peter K Sculco; Alexander S McLawhorn; Kaitlin M Carroll; Benjamin A McArthur; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-10-19

3.  The value of computed tomography based navigation in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Kuroda; Tamon Kabata; Toru Maeda; Yoshitomo Kajino; Shin Watanabe; Shintaro Iwai; Fujita Kenji; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Daisuke Inoue; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Double acetabular wall--a misleading point for hip arthroplasty: an anatomical, radiological, clinical study.

Authors:  Firooz Madadi; Hamed Yazdanshenas; Firoozeh Madadi; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Acetabular cup positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type III acetabular defects: Martell radiographic analysis.

Authors:  Ho-Rim Choi; David Anderson; Scott Foster; Matthew Beal; Jo Ann Lee; Christopher Barr; Henrik Malchau; Joseph McCarthy; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Hip resurfacing: a 40-year perspective.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.