Literature DB >> 21537336

Validity of the test-table-test for Nordic skiing for classification of paralympic sit-ski sports participants.

H F M Pernot1, A M Lannem, R P J Geers, E F G Ruijters, M Bloemendal, H A M Seelen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the interrater reliability and validity of the test-table-test (TTT) with which paralympic sports participants involved in Nordic sit-ski sports may be classified.
SETTING: Movement laboratory in a rehabilitation centre, The Netherlands.
METHODS: Thirty-three persons with a spinal cord injury caudally to Th2, a leg amputation, poliomyelitis affecting the trunk and/or lower extremities, or cerebral palsy participated. Subjects were classified according to a classification system for Nordic skiing (that is, five subclasses between LW10 and LW12) by two raters, involving, among others, a combination of four balance tests called TTT. The validity of the TTT was investigated using a gold standard, involving balance perturbation tests on a force plate and centre of pressure (CoP) displacement measurements.
RESULTS: As for the interrater reliability, Spearman's rank-correlation coefficient was 0.95 (P<0.001). As regards the validity of the TTT, correlation coefficients ranging from 0.61 to 0.74 (P<0.001) were found when comparing the data with the gold standard.
CONCLUSION: Interrater reliability was high in both scoring and classification. With regard to TTT validity, strong positive correlations between CoP displacement and TTT classification were found. Overall, the results of this study show that the TTT is a reliable and valid test. However, the relations between TTT and CoP displacement in the LW10 and LW10.5 subclasses found in this study are somewhat vague, which could be due to the small number of participants in these subclasses. For the LW10 and LW10.5 subclasses further refinement of the four tests within the TTT is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21537336     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2011.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  6 in total

1.  Challenging questions regarding the international standards.

Authors:  Ryan Solinsky; Steven C Kirshblum
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of common clinical tests for assessing abdominal muscle function after motor-complete spinal cord injury above T6.

Authors:  A Bjerkefors; J W Squair; R Malik; T Lam; Z Chen; M G Carpenter
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Current state of balance assessment during transferring, sitting, standing and walking activities for the spinal cord injured population: A systematic review.

Authors:  Tarun Arora; Alison Oates; Kaylea Lynd; Kristin E Musselman
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Overground vs. treadmill-based robotic gait training to improve seated balance in people with motor-complete spinal cord injury: a case report.

Authors:  Amanda E Chisholm; Raed A Alamro; Alison M M Williams; Tania Lam
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 5.  The impact of trunk impairment on performance of wheelchair activities with a focus on wheelchair court sports: a systematic review.

Authors:  Viola C Altmann; Anne L Hart; Yves C Vanlandewijck; Jacques van Limbeek; Miranda L van Hooff
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2015-05-07

6.  Reliability of measurement of active trunk movement in wheelchair basketball players.

Authors:  Jolanta Marszałek; Bartosz Molik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.