CONTEXT: People experiencing possible prodromal symptoms of psychosis have a very high risk of developing the disorder, but it is not possible to predict, on the basis of their presenting clinical features, which individuals will subsequently become psychotic. Recent neuroimaging studies suggest that there are volumetric differences between individuals at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis who later develop psychotic disorder and those who do not. However, the samples examined to date have been small, and the findings have been inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To assess brain structure in individuals at UHR for psychosis in a larger and more representative sample than in previous studies by combining magnetic resonance imaging data from 5 different scanning sites. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Multisite. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 182 individuals at UHR and 167 healthy controls. Participants were observed clinically for a mean of 2 years. Forty-eight individuals (26.4%) in the UHR group developed psychosis and 134 did not. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Magnetic resonance images were acquired from each participant. Group differences in gray matter volume were examined using optimized voxel-based morphometry. RESULTS: The UHR group as a whole had less gray matter volume than did controls in the frontal regions bilaterally. The UHR subgroup who later developed psychosis had less gray matter volume in the left parahippocampal cortex than did the UHR subgroup who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals at high risk for psychosis show alterations in regional gray matter volume regardless of whether they subsequently develop the disorder. In the UHR population, reduced left parahippocampal volume was specifically associated with the later onset of psychosis. Alterations in this region may, thus, be crucial to the expression of illness. Identifying abnormalities that specifically predate the onset of psychosis informs the development of clinical investigations designed to predict which individuals at high risk will subsequently develop the disorder.
CONTEXT: People experiencing possible prodromal symptoms of psychosis have a very high risk of developing the disorder, but it is not possible to predict, on the basis of their presenting clinical features, which individuals will subsequently become psychotic. Recent neuroimaging studies suggest that there are volumetric differences between individuals at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis who later develop psychotic disorder and those who do not. However, the samples examined to date have been small, and the findings have been inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To assess brain structure in individuals at UHR for psychosis in a larger and more representative sample than in previous studies by combining magnetic resonance imaging data from 5 different scanning sites. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Multisite. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 182 individuals at UHR and 167 healthy controls. Participants were observed clinically for a mean of 2 years. Forty-eight individuals (26.4%) in the UHR group developed psychosis and 134 did not. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Magnetic resonance images were acquired from each participant. Group differences in gray matter volume were examined using optimized voxel-based morphometry. RESULTS: The UHR group as a whole had less gray matter volume than did controls in the frontal regions bilaterally. The UHR subgroup who later developed psychosis had less gray matter volume in the left parahippocampal cortex than did the UHR subgroup who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals at high risk for psychosis show alterations in regional gray matter volume regardless of whether they subsequently develop the disorder. In the UHR population, reduced left parahippocampal volume was specifically associated with the later onset of psychosis. Alterations in this region may, thus, be crucial to the expression of illness. Identifying abnormalities that specifically predate the onset of psychosis informs the development of clinical investigations designed to predict which individuals at high risk will subsequently develop the disorder.
Authors: Ming T Tsuang; Jim Van Os; Rajiv Tandon; Deanna M Barch; Juan Bustillo; Wolfgang Gaebel; Raquel E Gur; Stephan Heckers; Dolores Malaspina; Michael J Owen; Susan Schultz; William Carpenter Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Ralf Tepest; Christopher J Schwarzbach; Barbara Krug; Joachim Klosterkötter; Stephan Ruhrmann; Kai Vogeley Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Jee In Kang; Hae-Jeong Park; Se Joo Kim; Kyung Ran Kim; Su Young Lee; Eun Lee; Suk Kyoon An; Jun Soo Kwon; Jong Doo Lee Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 9.306