Robert L Greenman1, Howard A Smithline. 1. Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Ma 02115, USA. rgreenma@bidmc.harvard.edu
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Heterogeneity of skeletal muscle structure, composition, and perfusion results in spatial differences in oxidative function between muscles and muscle regions. The simultaneous measurement of the postexercise phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery rate across all muscles of a human limb cross-section may provide new insights into normal physiology and disease states. The objective of this work was to assess the feasibility of acquiring PCr rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) images with sufficient temporal and spatial resolution to accurately measure PCr recovery kinetics in a cross-section of a human limb. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One normal subject performed a finger exercise until fatigued. At cessation of exercise surface coil localized pulse-and-acquire phosphorus-31 MR spectra ((31)P- magnetic resonance spectroscopy [MRS]) of the forearm were acquired at 6 S intervals for 4 minutes. The exercise protocol was repeated 7 days later and axial PCr RARE images of the forearm were acquired following exercise with 5.6 cm(3) voxels at 6-second intervals for 4 minutes. RESULTS: The PCr recovery time constants for the PCr RARE and (31)P-MRS measurements were 91.0 and 91.1 seconds, respectively, based on a monoexponential fit. A Pearson correlation test showed that the PCr recovery data that resulted from the RARE PCr imaging were highly correlated with the data resulting from the (31)P-MRS (r = 0.91, P < .0001). DISCUSSION: Data from selected regions of RARE PCr images acquired at 6-second intervals compare well to those acquired using surface coil (31)P MR spectroscopy and can provide an accurate assessment of PCr recovery kinetics.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Heterogeneity of skeletal muscle structure, composition, and perfusion results in spatial differences in oxidative function between muscles and muscle regions. The simultaneous measurement of the postexercise phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery rate across all muscles of a human limb cross-section may provide new insights into normal physiology and disease states. The objective of this work was to assess the feasibility of acquiring PCr rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) images with sufficient temporal and spatial resolution to accurately measure PCr recovery kinetics in a cross-section of a human limb. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One normal subject performed a finger exercise until fatigued. At cessation of exercise surface coil localized pulse-and-acquire phosphorus-31 MR spectra ((31)P- magnetic resonance spectroscopy [MRS]) of the forearm were acquired at 6 S intervals for 4 minutes. The exercise protocol was repeated 7 days later and axial PCr RARE images of the forearm were acquired following exercise with 5.6 cm(3) voxels at 6-second intervals for 4 minutes. RESULTS: The PCr recovery time constants for the PCr RARE and (31)P-MRS measurements were 91.0 and 91.1 seconds, respectively, based on a monoexponential fit. A Pearson correlation test showed that the PCr recovery data that resulted from the RARE PCr imaging were highly correlated with the data resulting from the (31)P-MRS (r = 0.91, P < .0001). DISCUSSION: Data from selected regions of RARE PCr images acquired at 6-second intervals compare well to those acquired using surface coil (31)P MR spectroscopy and can provide an accurate assessment of PCr recovery kinetics.
Authors: David C Isbell; Stuart S Berr; Alicia Y Toledano; Frederick H Epstein; Craig H Meyer; Walter J Rogers; Nancy L Harthun; Klaus D Hagspiel; Arthur Weltman; Christopher M Kramer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-05-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Andreas Oberbach; Yvonne Bossenz; Stefanie Lehmann; Josef Niebauer; Volker Adams; Ralf Paschke; Michael R Schön; Matthias Blüher; Karla Punkt Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: K K Kalliokoski; J Kemppainen; K Larmola; T O Takala; P Peltoniemi; A Oksanen; U Ruotsalainen; C Cobelli; J Knuuti; P Nuutila Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: E Suzuki; A Kashiwagi; H Hidaka; H Maegawa; Y Nishio; H Kojima; M Haneda; H Yasuda; S Morikawa; T Inubushi; R Kikkawa Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Andreas Boss; Linda Heskamp; Vincent Breukels; Lauren J Bains; Mark J van Uden; Arend Heerschap Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-03-25 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Ladislav Valkovič; Marek Chmelík; Martin Meyerspeer; Borjan Gagoski; Christopher T Rodgers; Martin Krššák; Ovidiu C Andronesi; Siegfried Trattnig; Wolfgang Bogner Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Martin Meyerspeer; Simon Robinson; Christine I Nabuurs; Tom Scheenen; Adrian Schoisengeier; Ewald Unger; Graham J Kemp; Ewald Moser Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 4.668