OBJECTIVES: To study the frequency of attendance in primary care of immigrant population compared to autochthonous one. To analyse differences in health services use according to geographical origin. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study was carried out. All Family Medicine and Paediatrics consultations were analysed using the electronic medical record. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study. We analysed all the medicine and paediatrics appointments data from the electronic medical record. LOCATION: Urban Health Centre, Zaragoza. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with an appointment at the Health Centre during a one year period. INTERVENTION: Is in line with the reference population with health cards by sex and age. Direct standardisation was performed to avoid differences due to different population distribution. MAIN MEASURES: Number of visits annually to the doctor, on the basis of national origin, sex and age. RESULTS: We analysed 110,046 adult consultations (based on a population of 20,675 inhabitants, 20% of immigrants) and 17,647 paediatric consultations (based on 2,452 children, 29% of immigrants). Adjusted annual consultation ratio of Spanish patients was higher than that of the immigrant population (7.1 consultations vs 4.8 in children, and 4.7 vs 2.8 in adults) (P<.001). Adults from Eastern Europe showed the lowest number of consultations (1.6). In emergency consultations in Primary Care, Spanish children consulted more frequently than immigrants, but immigrant adults consulted more frequently than Spanish adults. CONCLUSIONS: Immigrant population consulted primary care services less often compared with the Spanish population. There are notable differences according to geographical origin. This can be explained by better health, better use of healthcare system, and other difficulties in accessibility to health systems.
OBJECTIVES: To study the frequency of attendance in primary care of immigrant population compared to autochthonous one. To analyse differences in health services use according to geographical origin. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study was carried out. All Family Medicine and Paediatrics consultations were analysed using the electronic medical record. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study. We analysed all the medicine and paediatrics appointments data from the electronic medical record. LOCATION: Urban Health Centre, Zaragoza. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with an appointment at the Health Centre during a one year period. INTERVENTION: Is in line with the reference population with health cards by sex and age. Direct standardisation was performed to avoid differences due to different population distribution. MAIN MEASURES: Number of visits annually to the doctor, on the basis of national origin, sex and age. RESULTS: We analysed 110,046 adult consultations (based on a population of 20,675 inhabitants, 20% of immigrants) and 17,647 paediatric consultations (based on 2,452 children, 29% of immigrants). Adjusted annual consultation ratio of Spanish patients was higher than that of the immigrant population (7.1 consultations vs 4.8 in children, and 4.7 vs 2.8 in adults) (P<.001). Adults from Eastern Europe showed the lowest number of consultations (1.6). In emergency consultations in Primary Care, Spanish children consulted more frequently than immigrants, but immigrant adults consulted more frequently than Spanish adults. CONCLUSIONS: Immigrant population consulted primary care services less often compared with the Spanish population. There are notable differences according to geographical origin. This can be explained by better health, better use of healthcare system, and other difficulties in accessibility to health systems.
Authors: Antonio Salazar; Elena Navarro-Calderón; Irene Abad; Vicent Alberola; Fernando Almela; Rafael Borrás; Antonio González; Emilio Gosálbez; M José Moya; Pilar Palau; Fco Javier Roig; Ramón Romero; Francisco Taberner; Pilar Vicente Journal: Rev Esp Salud Publica Date: 2003 Nov-Dec