Literature DB >> 21536238

Chromosome banding analysis of cells from fine-needle aspiration biopsy samples from soft tissue and bone tumors: is it clinically meaningful?

Charles Walther1, Henryk A Domanski, Fredrik Vult von Steyern, Nils Mandahl, Fredrik Mertens.   

Abstract

Morphologic evaluation of samples from fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and core needle (CN) biopsies is an important part of the pretreatment diagnosis of bone and soft tissue tumors. Because most such tumors have characteristic, sometimes even specific, chromosomal rearrangements, ancillary genetic analyses could provide important diagnostic information. Whereas directed analyses, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization or reverse transcriptase−polymerase chain reaction, for specific genetic aberrations are well suited for the relatively small cell numbers obtained with FNA biopsies, the possibility to obtain tumor karyotypes after cell culturing has been less well studied. In the present study, karyotypes from 114 FNA biopsy samples were compared to those in corresponding surgical tumor samples; in addition, results on 31 CN samples and their corresponding tumor samples were available. Of the 138 surgical tumor samples, 88 (64%) showed clonal acquired chromosome aberrations, 42 (30%) displayed a normal karyotype, and 8 (6%) did not yield any karyotype as a result of infection or poor cell growth. The corresponding figures for the 114 FNA samples were 27 (24%), 28 (25%), and 59 (52%), and for the 31 CN samples 15 (48%), 10 (32%), and 6 (19%). The relatively low success rate, with the possible exception of primitive round cell/Ewing sarcomas (abnormal karyotype in 6 of 11 FNA samples), strongly indicates that it is not meaningful to attempt cell culturing and chromosome banding analysis on FNA biopsy sample cells in patients with suspected bone or soft tissue tumors. The use of ancillary techniques such as fluorescence in situ hybridization might improve the diagnostic value from FNA. Our preliminary data suggest that if a pretreatment karyotype is wanted, the cytogenetic analysis should be made on cells from CN samples, close to half of which showed an aberrant karyotype.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21536238     DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2011.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Genet


  4 in total

1.  [A plea for cytopathology].

Authors:  P Dalquen
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Cytogenetics of Spindle Cell/Pleomorphic Lipomas: Karyotyping and FISH Analysis of 31 Tumors.

Authors:  Ioannis Panagopoulos; Ludmila Gorunova; Marius Lund-Iversen; Kristin Andersen; Hege Kilen Andersen; Ingvild Lobmaier; Bodil Bjerkehagen; Sverre Heim
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.069

3.  The diagnostic utility of DNA copy number analysis of core needle biopsies from soft tissue and bone tumors.

Authors:  Jan Köster; Paul Piccinelli; Linda Arvidsson; Fredrik Vult von Steyern; Camila Bedeschi Rego De Mattos; Martin Almquist; Jenny Nilsson; Linda Magnusson; Fredrik Mertens
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 5.502

4.  Sarcoma undifferentiated (unclassified) fusiform cell type of mesentery: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Korbi Ibtissem; Korbi Asma; Ennaceur Farouk; Hajji Ahmed; Njima Manel; Boughanmi Faiez; Zouari Khadija; Faleh Raja
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-02-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.