Literature DB >> 21536210

Clinical outcomes assessment of consecutively finished patients in a 24-month orthodontic residency: a 5-year perspective.

Paul N Brown1, Richard Kulbersh, Richard Kaczynski.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to report on the clinical outcomes of a 24-month orthodontic residency.
METHODS: One examiner scored 1019 consecutive pretreatment records and 714 consecutive posttreatment records annually over 5 years, using the American Board of Orthodontics discrepancy index and objective grading system.
RESULTS: The mean discrepancy index scores were 19.63, 14.84, 12.30, 15.72, and 15.39 for years 1 through 5, respectively. The mean objective grading system scores were 31.16, 34.79, 28.55, 26.28, and 22.11 for years 1 through 5, respectively. The residents' completion rates for all cases were 58.9%, 60.5%, 82.7%, 74.4%, 78.2%, and 72.2% for years 1 through 5, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of an annual objective outcomes assessment benefited patients by improving objective grading system scores and reduced the number of transfers between residents (increased case completion rate), thus reducing faculty time for managing many transfer patients.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21536210     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol.

Authors:  Alvaro Carvajal-Flórez; Diana María Barbosa-Lis; Oscar Arturo Zapata-Noreña; Julissa Andrea Marín-Velásquez; Sergio Andrés Afanador-Bayona
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

2.  Factors influencing treatment efficiency.

Authors:  Min-Ho Jung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Evaluation of treatment outcomes in a 3 years post-graduate orthodontic program using the peer assessment rating (par).

Authors:  Paloma González-Gil-de-Bernabé; Carlos Bellot-Arcís; José M Montiel-Company; José L Gandía-Franco
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2014-10-01

4.  Orthodontic Treatment and Healthcare Goals: Evaluation of Multibrackets Treatment Results Using PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating).

Authors:  Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Paolo Zampetti; Giulia Luscher; Paola Gandini; José Luís Gandía-Franco; Andrea Scribante
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-10

5.  Effects of self-ligating brackets and other factors influencing orthodontic treatment outcomes: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Min-Ho Jung
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Orthodontic Treatment Characteristics and Outcomes in an Educational Setting.

Authors:  T Al-Jewair; V Ryan; S Warunek
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-04-30

7.  Cephalometric and occlusal changes of Class III malocclusion treated with or without extractions.

Authors:  Roberto Bombonatti; Arón Aliaga-Del Castillo; Juliana Fraga Soares Bombonatti; Daniela Garib; Bryan Tompson; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.