Literature DB >> 21535997

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of light therapy for antepartum depression.

Anna Wirz-Justice1, Anja Bader, Ulrike Frisch, Rolf-Dieter Stieglitz, Judith Alder, Johannes Bitzer, Irene Hösli, Sandra Jazbec, Francesco Benedetti, Michael Terman, Katherine L Wisner, Anita Riecher-Rössler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Affective disorder during pregnancy is a common condition requiring careful judgment to treat the depression while minimizing risk to the fetus. Following up on promising pilot trials, we studied the efficacy of light therapy.
METHOD: Twenty-seven pregnant women with nonseasonal major depressive disorder according to DSM-IV (outpatients, university polyclinic) were randomly assigned to 7,000 lux fluorescent bright white or 70 lux dim red (placebo) light administered at home in the morning upon awakening for 1 h/d in a 5-week double-blind trial carried out between October 2004 and October 2008. Clinical state was monitored weekly with the 29-item Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) with Atypical Depression Supplement (SIGH-ADS). Changes of rating scale scores over time were analyzed with the general linear model. Differences from baseline of SIGH-ADS and 17-item HDRS scores at every time point were the dependent variables, time was the within-subjects factor, and treatment was the between-subjects factor. The model also included baseline score of depression and gestational age at intervention start.
RESULTS: The superiority of bright light over dim light placebo was shown for both SIGH-ADS (R² = 0.251; F(3,23) = 3.91; P < .05) and HDRS (R² = 0.338; F(3,23) = 5.42; P < .01) when analyzing the week-by-week change from baseline, and HDRS scores showed a significant interaction of treatment with time (F(4,92) = 2.91; P < .05). Categorical analysis revealed that the response rate (HDRS ≥ 50% improvement) at week 5 was significantly greater for bright light (81.3%, n = 16) than for placebo light (45.5%, n = 11) (P < .05). Remission (final score ≤ 8) was attained by 68.6% versus 36.4%, respectively (P < .05). Expectation ratings did not differ significantly between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Bright white light treatment for 5 weeks improved depression during pregnancy significantly more than placebo dim red light. The study provides evidence that light therapy, a simple, cost-effective antidepressant modality with minimal side effects for the mother and no known risk for the unborn child, may be a useful nonpharmacologic approach in this difficult situation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01043289. © Copyright 2011 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21535997     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.10m06188blu

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  42 in total

Review 1.  Recognizing and treating peripartum depression.

Authors:  Bettina Hübner-Liebermann; Helmut Hausner; Markus Wittmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Antepartum depression severity is increased during seasonally longer nights: relationship to melatonin and cortisol timing and quantity.

Authors:  Charles J Meliska; Luis F Martínez; Ana M López; Diane L Sorenson; Sara Nowakowski; Daniel F Kripke; Jeffrey Elliott; Barbara L Parry
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  [The current state of research in bright light therapy].

Authors:  Daniela Bassa; Markus Canazei; Hartmann Hinterhuber; Elisabeth M Weiss
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr       Date:  2013-06-21

4.  Bright light for nonseasonal depression?

Authors:  Simon N Young
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.186

5.  Maternal Depression and Early Intervention: A Call for an Integration of Services.

Authors:  Shanna L Alvarez; Samantha Meltzer-Brody; Marcia Mandel; Linda Beeber
Journal:  Infants Young Child       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

Review 6.  Bright light therapy in the treatment of childhood and adolescence depression, antepartum depression, and eating disorders.

Authors:  Krzysztof Krysta; Marek Krzystanek; Małgorzata Janas-Kozik; Irena Krupka-Matuszczyk
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 7.  Chronobiological Therapy for Mood Disorders.

Authors:  Sara Dallaspezia; Masahiro Suzuki; Francesco Benedetti
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 8.  Complementary and alternative medicine therapies for perinatal depression.

Authors:  Kristina M Deligiannidis; Marlene P Freeman
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 5.237

Review 9.  [Affective disorders during pregnancy : Therapy with antidepressants and mood stabilizers].

Authors:  N Bergemann; W E Paulus
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.214

10.  Circadian phase shifts and mood across the perinatal period in women with a history of major depressive disorder: a preliminary communication.

Authors:  Katherine M Sharkey; Teri B Pearlstein; Mary A Carskadon
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.839

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.