Literature DB >> 21535268

Ectopic study of tissue-engineered bone complex with enamel matrix proteins, bone marrow stromal cells in porous calcium phosphate cement scaffolds, in nude mice.

X J Wang1, H Huang, F Yang, L G Xia, W J Zhang, X Q Jiang, F Q Zhang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the potential of enamel matrix proteins (EMPs) on promoting osteogenic differentiation of porcine bone marrow stromal cells (pBMSCs), as well as new bone formation capabilities, in a tissue-engineered bone complex scaffold of EMPs, pBMSCs and porous calcium phosphate cement (CPC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Effects of EMPs on pBMSCs in vitro was first determined by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, von Kossa staining assay and mRNA expression of ALP, bone sialoprotein (BSP) and osteocalcin (OCN) genes. Next, an ectopic new bone formation test was performed in a nude mouse model with four groups: CPC scaffold alone; CPC scaffold + EMPs; CPC scaffold + pBMSCs; and CPC scaffold + EMPs + pBMSCs, for 2 or 4 weeks.
RESULTS: ALP activity, von Kossa assay and mRNA expressions of ALP, BSP and OCN genes were all significantly higher with 150 μg/ml EMP treatment in vitro. In nude mice, new bone formation was detected only in the CPC scaffold + EMPs + pBMSCs group at 2 weeks. At 4 weeks, in the tissue-engineered construct there was significantly higher bone formation ability than other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: EMPs promoted osteogenic differentiation of pBMSCs, and the tissue-engineered complex of EMPs, pBMSCs and CPC scaffold may be a valuable alternative to be used in periodontal bone tissue engineering and regeneration.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21535268      PMCID: PMC6496638          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2011.00750.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Prolif        ISSN: 0960-7722            Impact factor:   6.831


  43 in total

1.  MicroSAGE analysis of 2,353 expressed genes in a single cell-derived colony of undifferentiated human mesenchymal stem cells reveals mRNAs of multiple cell lineages.

Authors:  N Tremain; J Korkko; D Ibberson; G C Kopen; C DiGirolamo; D G Phinney
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.277

2.  The effect of enamel matrix protein derivative on follicle cells in vitro.

Authors:  S S Hakki; J E Berry; M J Somerman
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  In vitro biologic response of human bone marrow stromal cells to enamel matrix derivative.

Authors:  Luigi Guida; Marco Annunziata; Francesco Carinci; Angelo Di Feo; Irene Passaro; Adriana Oliva
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.993

4.  Do bone grafts or barrier membranes provide additional treatment effects for infrabony lesions treated with enamel matrix derivatives? A network meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

Authors:  Yu-Kang Tu; Andrew Woolston; Clovis Mariano Faggion
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 5.  Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration.

Authors:  L Hammarström
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 8.728

6.  The effect of Emdogain on the growth and differentiation of rat bone marrow cells.

Authors:  J van den Dolder; A P G Vloon; J A Jansen
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.419

Review 7.  Bone sialoprotein.

Authors:  B Ganss; R H Kim; J Sodek
Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med       Date:  1999

8.  Assessment of the suitability of a new composite as a bone defect filler in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Zhaohui Pan; Pingping Jiang
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.963

9.  Mandibular repair in rats with premineralized silk scaffolds and BMP-2-modified bMSCs.

Authors:  Xinquan Jiang; Jun Zhao; Shaoyi Wang; Xiaojuan Sun; Xiuli Zhang; Jake Chen; David L Kaplan; Zhiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Stem cells in tissue engineering.

Authors:  P Bianco; P G Robey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bone Tissue Engineering with Multilayered Scaffolds-Part I: An Approach for Vascularizing Engineered Constructs In Vivo.

Authors:  Binulal Nelson Sathy; Ullas Mony; Deepthy Menon; V K Baskaran; Antonios G Mikos; Shantikumar Nair
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Stem Cells and Calcium Phosphate Cement Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  P Wang; L Zhao; W Chen; X Liu; M D Weir; H H K Xu
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Enamel matrix derivative inhibits adipocyte differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells via activation of TGF-βRI kinase activity.

Authors:  Reinhard Gruber; Dieter D Bosshardt; Richard J Miron; Anja C Gemperli; Daniel Buser; Anton Sculean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Prostaglandin EP4 Selective Agonist AKDS001 Enhances New Bone Formation by Minimodeling in a Rat Heterotopic Xenograft Model of Human Bone.

Authors:  Yuichiro Ukon; Masahiro Nishida; Natsumi Yamamori; Kazuhiro Takeyama; Kazuhito Sakamoto; Shota Takenaka; Takahiro Makino; Takahito Fujimori; Yusuke Sakai; Yuya Kanie; Joe Kodama; Zeynep Bal; Daisuke Tateiwa; Shinichi Nakagawa; Hiromasa Hirai; Seiji Okada; Takashi Kaito
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-17

5.  Apoptosis repressor with caspase recruitment domain enhances survival and promotes osteogenic differentiation of human osteoblast cells under Zoledronate treatment.

Authors:  Longwei Hu; Jing Han; Xi Yang; Yang Wang; Hongya Pan; Liqun Xu
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.952

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.