Literature DB >> 21535197

Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses.

Shigetaka Yoshinaga1, Haruhisa Suzuki, Ichiro Oda, Yutaka Saito.   

Abstract

Since it was developed in 1992, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been widely used and has been adapted for gastrointestinal and perigastrointestinal lesions. A medical literature review to evaluate the role of EUS-FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses showed a 78-95% sensitivity, 75-100% specificity, 98-100% positive predictive value, 46-80% negative predictive value and a 78-95% accuracy. The reported complication rates of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid masses were 0-2%, although the criteria for complications varied among the studies. Because of its high diagnostic yield and low complication rate, EUS-FNA is cost-effective and widely applicable for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses, and is the best initial and the preferred secondary method compared with other biopsy techniques, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biopsy, computed tomography/ultrasound-FNA and surgery. Although EUS-FNA is 'a nearly perfected procedure,' controversy remains, such as the most suitable diameter of the needle, the appropriate number of needle passes and the necessity of on-site cytopathological evaluation. Recently investigators reported that using molecular analysis of EUS-FNA samples can achieve a higher diagnostic efficacy. Further research is encouraged to optimize the EUS-FNA procedure to reach its maximum diagnostic yield for solid pancreatic masses.
© 2011 The Authors. Digestive Endoscopy © 2011 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21535197     DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01112.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Endosc        ISSN: 0915-5635            Impact factor:   7.559


  48 in total

1.  Diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle sampling for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Cen Zhang; Quan-Lin Li; Yong-Fu Yu; Li-Qing Yao; Mei-Dong Xu; Yi-Qun Zhang; Yun-Shi Zhong; Wei-Feng Chen; Ping-Hong Zhou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the molecular diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Bournet; Marion Gayral; Jérôme Torrisani; Janick Selves; Pierre Cordelier; Louis Buscail
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kajsa E Affolter; Robert L Schmidt; Anna P Matynia; Douglas G Adler; Rachel E Factor
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.

Authors:  Ji Young Bang; Shantel Hebert-Magee; Jessica Trevino; Jayapal Ramesh; Shyam Varadarajulu
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Pancreatic pseudocyst after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic mass.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Chung; Ji Kon Ryu; Hong Sang Oh; Ji Yeon Seo; Eunhyo Jin; Dong Hyeon Lee; Yong-Tae Kim; Yong Bum Yoon
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2012-11-30

6.  Ultrasound-guided vs endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Masato Matsuyama; Hiroshi Ishii; Kensuke Kuraoka; Seigo Yukisawa; Akiyoshi Kasuga; Masato Ozaka; Sho Suzuki; Kouichi Takano; Yuko Sugiyama; Takao Itoi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of mass lesions.

Authors:  Chaoqun Han; Rong Lin; Qin Zhang; Jun Liu; Zhen Ding; Xiaohua Hou
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 8.  Cell-block procedure in endoscopic ultrasound-guided-fine-needle-aspiration of gastrointestinal solid neoplastic lesions.

Authors:  Antonio Ieni; Valeria Barresi; Paolo Todaro; Rosario Alberto Caruso; Giovanni Tuccari
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25

9.  Evaluating comparative effectiveness with observational data: endoscopic ultrasound and survival in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Abhishek D Parmar; Kristin M Sheffield; Yimei Han; Gabriela M Vargas; Praveen Guturu; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  A systematic review of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms: are these rare lesions?

Authors:  Joanna K Law; Aadil Ahmed; Vikesh K Singh; Venkata S Akshintala; Matthew T Olson; Siva P Raman; Syed Z Ali; Elliot K Fishman; Ihab Kamel; Marcia I Canto; Marco Dal Molin; Robert A Moran; Mouen A Khashab; Nita Ahuja; Michael Goggins; Ralph H Hruban; Christopher L Wolfgang; Anne Marie Lennon
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.