BACKGROUND: Individuals who begin drinking during early adolescence and exhibit externalizing pathology and disinhibitory/dysregulatory tendencies are more vulnerable to developing alcohol use disorders (AUDs) in adulthood. Previous research has focused on in-treatment populations with substantial comorbid psychopathology and polysubstance use. Here, we characterize a unique sample of treatment-naïve adolescents without such comorbidity to help identify vulnerable youth who may benefit from early intervention. METHODS: We compared externalizing propensity, disinhibitory characteristics, and school performance in adolescents with AUDs (but without comorbid psychopathology or other substance use; n = 70) to those of demographically matched controls (n = 70). Within the AUD group, we compared measures of substance use and the disinhibitory syndrome between boys and girls with differing severity of externalizing propensity. RESULTS: Adolescents with AUDs demonstrated more externalizing propensity and disinhibitory personality traits (impulsivity, novelty seeking, and excitement seeking), poorer self-monitoring and response inhibition, more bullying and sexual risk-taking behavior, poorer first-language performance, and greater use of alcohol, cannabis, and nicotine (p < 0.05). Within the AUD group, participants with higher externalizing propensity began drinking earlier, more frequently, and for a longer duration than those with lower externalizing symptoms (p < 0.05). Disinhibitory features (personality, cognition, and behavior) were, however, not stronger in those with higher externalizing propensity. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the constructs of externalizing propensity and disinhibitory syndrome are useful in characterizing treatment-naïve adolescents with AUDs but without comorbid psychopathology or polysubstance use. These results support the importance of these constructs in understanding adolescent AUDs, even when the frank externalizing diagnoses of childhood (oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder) are excluded. 2011 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.
BACKGROUND: Individuals who begin drinking during early adolescence and exhibit externalizing pathology and disinhibitory/dysregulatory tendencies are more vulnerable to developing alcohol use disorders (AUDs) in adulthood. Previous research has focused on in-treatment populations with substantial comorbid psychopathology and polysubstance use. Here, we characterize a unique sample of treatment-naïve adolescents without such comorbidity to help identify vulnerable youth who may benefit from early intervention. METHODS: We compared externalizing propensity, disinhibitory characteristics, and school performance in adolescents with AUDs (but without comorbid psychopathology or other substance use; n = 70) to those of demographically matched controls (n = 70). Within the AUD group, we compared measures of substance use and the disinhibitory syndrome between boys and girls with differing severity of externalizing propensity. RESULTS: Adolescents with AUDs demonstrated more externalizing propensity and disinhibitory personality traits (impulsivity, novelty seeking, and excitement seeking), poorer self-monitoring and response inhibition, more bullying and sexual risk-taking behavior, poorer first-language performance, and greater use of alcohol, cannabis, and nicotine (p < 0.05). Within the AUD group, participants with higher externalizing propensity began drinking earlier, more frequently, and for a longer duration than those with lower externalizing symptoms (p < 0.05). Disinhibitory features (personality, cognition, and behavior) were, however, not stronger in those with higher externalizing propensity. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the constructs of externalizing propensity and disinhibitory syndrome are useful in characterizing treatment-naïve adolescents with AUDs but without comorbid psychopathology or polysubstance use. These results support the importance of these constructs in understanding adolescent AUDs, even when the frank externalizing diagnoses of childhood (oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder) are excluded. 2011 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.
Authors: Catherine A Martin; Thomas H Kelly; Mary Kay Rayens; Bethanie R Brogli; Allen Brenzel; W Jackson Smith; Hatim A Omar Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Andrew C H Chen; Bernice Porjesz; Madhavi Rangaswamy; Chella Kamarajan; Yongqiang Tang; Kevin A Jones; David B Chorlian; Arthur T Stimus; Henri Begleiter Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Susan F Tapert; Alecia D Schweinsburg; Valerie C Barlett; Sandra A Brown; Lawrence R Frank; Gregory G Brown; M J Meloy Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Lori A J Scott-Sheldon; Paige Walstrom; Abigail Harrison; Seth C Kalichman; Michael P Carey Journal: Curr HIV Res Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 1.581
Authors: Andrew Crawford; Shareefa Dalvie; Sarah Lewis; Anthony King; Israel Liberzon; George Fein; Karestan Koenen; Rajkumar Ramesar; Dan J Stein Journal: Metab Brain Dis Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 3.584
Authors: Kaylee S van Wyhe; Barbara Laughton; Mark F Cotton; Ernesta M Meintjes; Andre Jw van der Kouwe; Michael J Boivin; Martin Kidd; Kevin Gf Thomas Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2021-07 Impact factor: 5.396