Literature DB >> 21534985

Dissociation of Pe and ERN/Ne in the conscious recognition of an error.

Johannes Hewig1, Michael G H Coles, Ralf H Trippe, Holger Hecht, Wolfgang H R Miltner.   

Abstract

We evaluated the relationship between conscious awareness and the ERN/Ne and Pe in a digit entering task. On each trial, participants rated the accuracy of their responses on a three-point scale (incorrect, unsure, correct). The ERN/Ne was present on incorrect trials judged as incorrect. The Pe was evident on the same trials but also on correct and incorrect trials judged as unsure. We propose that the ERN/Ne occurs when there is an incorrect execution of a correct motor plan and the representation of the correct response is available for comparison with the actual response. The mismatch information that results from this comparison can be transferred to the Pe process and conscious awareness. However, the Pe process and conscious awareness do not only depend on this transfer of information from the ERN/Ne process. The Pe also occurs when there is uncertainty about the correctness of the motor plan, whether or not the plan is, in fact, correct.
Copyright © 2011 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21534985     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01209.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  17 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of ERP and fMRI studies investigating inhibitory control and error processing in people with substance dependence and behavioural addictions.

Authors:  Maartje Luijten; Marise W J Machielsen; Dick J Veltman; Robert Hester; Lieuwe de Haan; Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.186

2.  Error-monitoring and post-error compensations: dissociation between perceptual failures and motor errors with and without awareness.

Authors:  Ana Navarro-Cebrian; Robert T Knight; Andrew S Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A condition-independent framework for the classification of error-related brain activity.

Authors:  Ioannis Kakkos; Errikos M Ventouras; Pantelis A Asvestas; Irene S Karanasiou; George K Matsopoulos
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Error awareness and the error-related negativity: evaluating the first decade of evidence.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Temporospatial dissociation of Pe subcomponents for perceived and unperceived errors.

Authors:  Tanja Endrass; Julia Klawohn; Julia Preuss; Norbert Kathmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Is there any electrophysiological evidence for subliminal error processing?

Authors:  Shani Shalgi; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Is any awareness necessary for an Ne?

Authors:  Shani Shalgi; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Distinct brain mechanisms for conscious versus subliminal error detection.

Authors:  Lucie Charles; Filip Van Opstal; Sébastien Marti; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Neural and behavioral traces of error awareness.

Authors:  Hans Kirschner; Jil Humann; Jan Derrfuss; Claudia Danielmeier; Markus Ullsperger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Error awareness as evidence accumulation: effects of speed-accuracy trade-off on error signaling.

Authors:  Marco Steinhauser; Nick Yeung
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.