Literature DB >> 21534838

Reducing sensitive survey response bias in research on adolescents: a comparison of web-based and paper-and-pencil administration.

David L Wyrick1, Lloyd Bond.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Using the Problem Oriented Screening Instrument for Teenagers (POSIT), the effect of mode of administration on (1) students' willingness to disclose sensitive information and (2) response rates was investigated.
DESIGN: A 2 × 2 unequal N factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) design was employed. Mode of administration (paper-and-pencil vs. Web-based) was crossed with grade level (middle vs. high school).
SETTING: The study was conducted in two middle and two high schools.
SUBJECTS: A total of 628 middle and high school students completed the survey. MEASURES: The POSIT is a self-report measure with 139 yes/no items that identifies stressors in 10 functional areas (e.g., Substance Use). ANALYSIS: An unequal N 2 (mode) × 2 (grade level) factorial ANOVA was employed.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found for self-reported risk across modes of administration. Students completing the Web-based version of the survey were four times more likely to skip an item.
CONCLUSIONS: Effect of Mode on Reporting of Sensitive Information-Students completed the Web-based surveys in computer labs with other students. The intent of the Web-based survey was to increase perceived privacy but the environment likely negated any effect. Effect of Mode on Response Rates-The higher response rate for the paper-and-pencil survey was the opposite of what was expected and revealed that students were more likely to skip sensitive items on the Web survey.
Copyright © 2011 by American Journal of Health Promotion, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21534838     DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.080611-ARB-90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  11 in total

1.  Social Psychological Predictors of Sleep Hygiene Behaviors in Australian and Hong Kong University Students.

Authors:  Kyra Hamilton; Hei Tung Heather Ng; Chun-Qing Zhang; Daniel J Phipps; Ru Zhang
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2021-04

2.  Why Are National Estimates So Different? A Comparison of Youth E-Cigarette Use and Cigarette Smoking in the MTF and PATH Surveys.

Authors:  Carol J Boyd; Philip Veliz; Rebecca J Evans-Polce; Andria B Eisman; Sean Esteban McCabe
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.582

3.  Perpetration of Adolescent Dating Relationship Abuse: The Role of Conditional Tolerance for Violence and Friendship Factors.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mumford; Bruce G Taylor; Peggy C Giordano
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2017-02-01

4.  The design and implementation of a randomized controlled trial of a risk reduction and human immunodeficiency virus prevention videogame intervention in minority adolescents: PlayForward: Elm City Stories.

Authors:  Lynn E Fiellin; Tassos C Kyriakides; Kimberly D Hieftje; Tyra M Pendergrass; Lindsay R Duncan; James D Dziura; Benjamin G Sawyer; David A Fiellin
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Overcoming Challenges in School-Wide Survey Administration.

Authors:  Catherine N Rasberry; India Rose; Elizabeth Kroupa; Andrew Hebert; Amanda Geller; Elana Morris; Catherine A Lesesne
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2017-09-19

6.  An exploration of the data collection methods utilised with children, teenagers and young people (CTYPs).

Authors:  Sarah M Flanagan; Sheila Greenfield; Jane Coad; Susan Neilson
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-03-01

7.  Novel Interventions and Assessments Using Patient Portals in Adolescent Research: Confidential Survey Study.

Authors:  Lindsay A Thompson; Rebeccah Mercado; Thomas Martinko; Ratna Acharya
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study.

Authors:  Elvira Mauz; Robert Hoffmann; Robin Houben; Laura Krause; Panagiotis Kamtsiuris; Antje Gößwald
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Web-based versus traditional paper questionnaires: a mixed-mode survey with a Nordic perspective.

Authors:  Lena Hohwü; Heidi Lyshol; Mika Gissler; Stefan Hrafn Jonsson; Max Petzold; Carsten Obel
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  The Influence of Parental Control and Parent-Child Relational Qualities on Adolescent Internet Addiction: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Daniel T L Shek; Xiaoqin Zhu; Cecilia M S Ma
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.