Literature DB >> 21534716

Hearing improvement after cochlear implantation in common cavity malformed cochleae: long-term follow-up results.

Joong Ho Ahn1, Hyun Woo Lim, Kwang-Sun Lee.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: We suggest that cochlear implantation (CI) should be a good therapeutic modality for hearing restoration in patients with common cavity malformed ears.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze hearing improvement from CI performed in common cavity malformed cochleae.
METHODS: A total of 11 patients (5 male and 6 female, mean age 4.5 ± 2.8 years) and 12 ears were enrolled in this study. During the insertion of electrodes, we used C-arm fluoroscopy to avoid intrameatal placement. We evaluated hearing improvement every 6 months and the mean follow-up period was 80.5 ± 24.1 months (53-125 months).
RESULTS: During the operation, there were only four cases with fully inserted electrodes. Cerebrospinal fluid gushed out in two cases during the cochleostomy and postoperative meningitis occurred in two patients. One patient had to undergo reimplantation 4 years later due to device failure and recurrent meningitis. During the 48 months follow-up hearing evaluation, the ability of hearing increased along with the age. The final average MAIS, CAP, SIR, and open set one- and two-syllable word scores were 90.3 ± 18.1%, 4.9 ± 1.6, 3.1 ± 0.9, 24.1 ± 25.9%, and 48.6 ± 38.7%, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21534716     DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2011.570786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  8 in total

1.  Auditory Brainstem Implant Array Position Varies Widely Among Adult and Pediatric Patients and Is Associated With Perception.

Authors:  Samuel R Barber; Elliott D Kozin; Aaron K Remenschneider; Sidharth V Puram; Max Smith; Barbara S Herrmann; Mary E Cunnane; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Post-Meningitis Deafness: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Kaajal Singhal; Juhi Singhal; Jameel Muzaffar; Peter Monksfield; Manohar Bance
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.017

3.  Evaluation of auditory pathway by EABR before cochlear implantation and the postoperative effect analysis.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Xiaohui Guo; Keli Cao; Chaogang Wei; Zhiqiang Gao; Suju Wang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Cochlear implantation in common cavity deformity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ayshah Al-Mahboob; Salman F Alhabib; Yassin Abdelsamad; Farid Alzhrani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Analysis of Long-Term Cochlear Implantation Outcomes and Correlation With Imaging Characteristics in Patients With Common Cavity Deformity.

Authors:  Lifang Zhang; Biao Chen; Ying Kong; Natalia Liau; Xingmei Wei; Ying Shi; Jingyuan Chen; Mengge Yang; Anandhan Dhanasingh; Yongxin Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Cochlear Implants for Patients With Common Cavity Deformities and the Impact of Electrode Positioning.

Authors:  Seong Hoon Bae; Jihoon Choi; Jae Young Choi
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.372

7.  Cochlear implantation outcomes in children with common cavity deformity; a retrospective study.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Jianxin Qiu; Feifei Qin; Mei Zhong; Gyanendra Shah
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-04-28

8.  Audiological and Speech Performance After Cochlear Implantation in Cochlear Aplasia Deformity.

Authors:  Salman F Alhabib
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-07-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.