Literature DB >> 21534179

[The neuroophthalmic supplement to the NEI-VFQ: test statistics and validation with a cohort of patients with pre- and postchiasmatic damage].

C Wagenbreth1, B A Sabel, S Tönnies, C Gall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ) is not sufficient to assess vision-related quality of life in patients with vision impairments caused by neuroophthalmic deficits. The neuroophthalmic supplement to the NEI-VFQ is currently only available in an English version. The supplement was translated into German and three items concerning visual field loss were added.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: NEI-VFQ and supplement data were collected from 62 pre- and postchiasmatic patients with visual field defects and from 245 healthy reference persons. NEI-VFQ and supplement were psychometrically tested and validated. Relations between visual field variables and vision-related quality of life were assessed.
RESULTS: The patient group showed diminished quality of life in 10 NEI-VFQ subscales and in eight supplement items when compared to age-matched healthy controls. Correlations between supplement and visual field diagnostic variables demonstrate moderate relations between visual field loss and deterioration of vision-related quality of life. A Cronbach's α of 0.81 for the supplement can be increased to 0.92 in combination with the NEI-VFQ, the sole application of the NEI-VFQ generates an alpha of 0.93 in this sample. A factor analysis reveals four factors that cover the 13 items capturing the following issues: 'severity/problems due to the visual field defect", "unusual eyelid appearances", "blurry vision/double vision" and "diverse vision of both eyes"; 72 % of the variance can be explained by these four factors.
CONCLUSION: The German translation of the neuroophthalmic supplement to the NEI-VFQ captures additional vision-specific problems beyond the sole NEI-VFQ that are often reported by patients with vision impairments after brain damage. Although the relevance of some items can be questioned, nevertheless the supplement qualifies for an enhanced outline of subjective vision impairments that are not included in the previous NEI-VFQ. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21534179     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1246062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd        ISSN: 0023-2165            Impact factor:   0.700


  3 in total

1.  Response: "Commentary: Mental distress in patients with cerebral visual injury assessed with the German Brief Symptom Inventory".

Authors:  Carolin Gall; Doreen Brösel; Gabriele H Franke
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 5.750

2.  Remaining visual field and preserved subjective visual functioning prevent mental distress in patients with visual field defects.

Authors:  Carolin Gall; Doreen Brösel; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Investigation of Visual System Involvement in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 14.

Authors:  Thomas Ihl; Ella M Kadas; Timm Oberwahrenbrock; Matthias Endres; Thomas Klockgether; Jan Schroeter; Alexander U Brandt; Friedemann Paul; Martina Minnerop; Sarah Doss; Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch; Hanna G Zimmermann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.847

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.