Literature DB >> 21534092

Unreliability and error in the military's "gold standard" measure of sexual harassment by education and gender.

Maureen Murdoch1, John B Pryor, Joan M Griffin, Diane Cowper Ripley, Gary D Gackstetter, Melissa A Polusny, James S Hodges.   

Abstract

The Department of Defense's "gold standard" sexual harassment measure, the Sexual Harassment Core Measure (SHCore), is based on an earlier measure that was developed primarily in college women. Furthermore, the SHCore requires a reading grade level of 9.1. This may be higher than some troops' reading abilities and could generate unreliable estimates of their sexual harassment experiences. Results from 108 male and 96 female soldiers showed that the SHCore's temporal stability and alternate-forms reliability was significantly worse (a) in soldiers without college experience compared to soldiers with college experience and (b) in men compared to women. For men without college experience, almost 80% of the temporal variance in SHCore scores was attributable to error. A plain language version of the SHCore had mixed effects on temporal stability depending on education and gender. The SHCore may be particularly ill suited for evaluating population trends of sexual harassment in military men without college experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21534092      PMCID: PMC6483080          DOI: 10.1080/15299732.2011.551506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Dissociation        ISSN: 1529-9732


  9 in total

1.  A coefficient alpha for test-retest data.

Authors:  Samuel B Green
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-03

2.  Response categories and anger measurement: do fewer categories result in poorer measurement?: development of the DAR5.

Authors:  Graeme Hawthorne; Joanne Mouthaan; David Forbes; Raymond W Novaco
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Childhood maltreatment history as a risk factor for sexual harassment among U.S. Army soldiers.

Authors:  L N Rosen; L Martin
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  1998

4.  The role of sexual assault on the risk of PTSD among Gulf War veterans.

Authors:  Han Kang; Nancy Dalager; Clare Mahan; Erick Ishii
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Are men sexually harassed? If so, by whom?

Authors:  C R Waldo; J L Berdahl; L F Fitzgerald
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  1998-02

6.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.

Authors:  G Guyatt; S Walter; G Norman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

7.  The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument.

Authors:  D Mayfield; G McLeod; P Hall
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Screening for pregnancy risk-drinking.

Authors:  M Russell; S S Martier; R J Sokol; P Mudar; S Bottoms; S Jacobson; J Jacobson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Deployment stressors, gender, and mental health outcomes among Gulf War I veterans.

Authors:  Dawne S Vogt; Anica P Pless; Lynda A King; Daniel W King
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2005-04
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Does the Factor Structure of Military Sexual Stressors in Men Correspond to Women's? A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Using the Sexual Harassment Inventory.

Authors:  Madhavi K Reddy; Maureen Murdoch
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.437

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.