Literature DB >> 2153405

Interaction of cytochrome c with cytochrome c oxidase: an understanding of the high- to low-affinity transition.

E A Garber1, E Margoliash.   

Abstract

The steady-state kinetics of high- and low-affinity electron transfer reactions between various cytochromes c and cytochrome c oxidase (ferrocytochrome c:oxygen oxidoreductase, EC 1.9.3.1) preparations were studied spectrophotometrically and polarographically. The dissociation constants for the binding of the first and second molecules of horse cytochrome c (I = 15 mM) are 5.10(-8) M and 1.10(-5) M, respectively, close to the spectrophotometric Km values and consistent with the controlled binding model for the interaction between cytochrome c and cytochrome oxidase (Speck, S.H., Dye, D. and Margoliash, E. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 346-351) which postulates that the binding of a second molecule of cytochrome c weakens that of the first, resulting in low-affinity kinetics. While the Km of the polarographically assayed high-affinity reaction is comparable to that observed spectrophotometrically, the low-affinity Km is over an order of magnitude smaller and cannot be attributed to the binding of a second molecule of cytochrome c. Increasing the viscosity has no effect on the Vmax of the low-affinity reaction assayed polarographically, but increases the Km. Thus, the transition from high- to low-affinity kinetics is dependent on the frequency of productive collisions, as expected for a hysteresis model ascribing the transition to the trapping of the oxidase in a primed state for turnover. At ionic strengths above 150 mM, the rate of cytochrome c oxidation decreases without any correlation to the calculated net charge of the cytochrome c, indicating rate-limiting rearrangement of the two proteins in proximity to each other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2153405     DOI: 10.1016/0005-2728(90)90032-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  7 in total

1.  Structural basis of mitochondrial dysfunction in response to cytochrome c phosphorylation at tyrosine 48.

Authors:  Blas Moreno-Beltrán; Alejandra Guerra-Castellano; Antonio Díaz-Quintana; Rebecca Del Conte; Sofía M García-Mauriño; Sofía Díaz-Moreno; Katiuska González-Arzola; Carlos Santos-Ocaña; Adrián Velázquez-Campoy; Miguel A De la Rosa; Paola Turano; Irene Díaz-Moreno
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ferricytochrome c induces monophasic kinetics of ferrocytochrome c oxidation in cytochrome c oxidase.

Authors:  A Reimann; K H Röhm; B Kadenbach
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.945

3.  Proton pumping by cytochrome oxidase as studied by time-resolved stopped-flow spectrophotometry.

Authors:  G Antonini; F Malatesta; P Sarti; M Brunori
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Product-controlled steady-state kinetics between cytochrome aa(3) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides and equine ferrocytochrome c analyzed by a novel spectrophotometric approach.

Authors:  Myat T Lin; Robert B Gennis
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-04-06

5.  Surface plasmon resonance studies of complex formation between cytochrome c and bovine cytochrome c oxidase incorporated into a supported planar lipid bilayer. II. Binding of cytochrome c to oxidase-containing cardiolipin/phosphatidylcholine membranes.

Authors:  Z Salamon; G Tollin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Cytochrome c: Surfing Off of the Mitochondrial Membrane on the Tops of Complexes III and IV.

Authors:  Gonzalo Pérez-Mejías; Alejandra Guerra-Castellano; Antonio Díaz-Quintana; Miguel A De la Rosa; Irene Díaz-Moreno
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 7.271

7.  Comparisons of subunit 5A and 5B isoenzymes of yeast cytochrome c oxidase.

Authors:  Raksha Dodia; Brigitte Meunier; Christopher W M Kay; Peter R Rich
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.857

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.